Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat yield per pot at 60 mg L −1 was 19.71 g, 377.24% higher than control yield.

A claim from Efficacious Role of Biogenically Synthesized Silica Nanoparticles for Promoting Growth and Reducing Leaching in Wheat · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield per pot at 60 mg L −1 was 19.71 g, 377.24% higher than control yield.

Treatment
60 mg L −1 Si‐NPse0
Outcome
yield per pote0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.71 ge0
Qualifier
377.24%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield per pot of plants treated with 60 mg L −1 Si‐NPs was 19.71 g, significantly higher (377.24%) than the control yield per pot of 4.13 g.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1670
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117

Title

Efficacious Role of Biogenically Synthesized Silica Nanoparticles for Promoting Growth and Reducing Leaching in Wheat

Divya Siwach; Anu Gupta Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment 2026. doi:10.1002/sae2.70142

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-7b232e3114a1a4e491b810e5fe97940cd5b3593da6f228b6a46fe550db3eae74 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

251 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.