Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Drip fertigation reduced yield penalties when density departed from optimum.

A claim from Drip Fertigation Enhances Nitrogen Uptake and Improves Winter Wheat Yield and Stability Across Planting Densities · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip fertigation reduced yield penalties when density departed from optimum.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
DFe0
Outcome
yield penaltiese0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
when planting density deviated from the optimume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DF improved N uptake and source–sink coordination, enabling high yield and reduced yield penalties when planting density deviated from the optimum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1939
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–67

Title

Drip Fertigation Enhances Nitrogen Uptake and Improves Winter Wheat Yield and Stability Across Planting Densities

Xiaoyan Zhou; Mei Qian; Faming Wang; et al. Plants 2026. doi:10.3390/plants15071090

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-7c76e5811af2c74d950ca5e6de1edcea7edc2ed878d8871356cc407b2d3b93a0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.