Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano Fe/SiO2 at 15 mg kg−1 increased barley shoot length by 8.25%.

A claim from Effects of nano Fe/SiO2fertilizers on germination and growth of barley and maize · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano Fe/SiO2 at 15 mg kg−1 increased barley shoot length by 8.25%.

Treatment
15 mg kg−1 of nano Fe/SiO2e0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.25%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 15 mg kg−1 of nano Fe/SiO2 increased the shoot length: 8.25% and 20.8% for barley and maize, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–672

Title

Effects of nano Fe/SiO2fertilizers on germination and growth of barley and maize

Marjan Najafi Disfani; Azadeh Mikhak; Mohammad Zaman Kassaee; et al. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2016. doi:10.1080/03650340.2016.1239016

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-7e941fa96bbfc28e8264814ff636acdb92faaf34c4d5a43ed14c9af51d3c9992 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

iron atom · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

silicon dioxide · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 25 positive, 10 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.