Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano Fe/SiO2 at 15 mg kg−1 increased maize shoot length by 20.8%.

A claim from Effects of nano Fe/SiO2fertilizers on germination and growth of barley and maize · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano Fe/SiO2 at 15 mg kg−1 increased maize shoot length by 20.8%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
15 mg kg−1 of nano Fe/SiO2e0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.8%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 15 mg kg−1 of nano Fe/SiO2 increased the shoot length: 8.25% and 20.8% for barley and maize, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–672

Title

Effects of nano Fe/SiO2fertilizers on germination and growth of barley and maize

Marjan Najafi Disfani; Azadeh Mikhak; Mohammad Zaman Kassaee; et al. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2016. doi:10.1080/03650340.2016.1239016

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-4e01954c8b1576ca653e3b0b10750da73256578b21d78872798952671edd9097 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

iron atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

64 papers: 57 positive, 7 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

silicon dioxide · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 161 positive, 21 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this claim · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

173 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.