Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Silica derived from rice husk ash and impregnated with neem and rosemary oils retained more than 85% of the germinative capacity of stored maize grains even after prolonged storage.

A claim from Use of essential and vegetable oil-impregnated rice husk silica to control Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky) on stored maize (Zea Mays L.) seeds · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica derived from rice husk ash and impregnated with neem and rosemary oils retained more than 85% of the germinative capacity of stored maize grains even after prolonged storage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
silica derived from rice husk ash and impregnated with neem and rosemary oilse0
Outcome
germinative capacitye0
Direction
retainede0
Value
more than 85%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silica derived from rice husk ash and impregnated with neem and rosemary oils could be a promising alternative to synthetic pesticides for storing maize grains, as it retained more than 85% of their germinative capacity even after prolonged storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1450

Title

Use of essential and vegetable oil-impregnated rice husk silica to control Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky) on stored maize (Zea Mays L.) seeds

Bertrand Zing Zing; Winy Virgile Nanfa Guemfo; Christian Toumo Nana; et al. Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center 2026. doi:10.1186/s42269-026-01388-w

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-f9b2fe9904d2498f57a01c8024feff82a67b7c442b6db181cbfca22b1bfb2860 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Salvia rosmarinus · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Oryza sativa · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

silicon dioxide · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.