Intervention effectmodel-written summary

paraquat (700 g ai ha−1) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha−1) applied at replanting controlled initial corn stands by 96 to 100% and produced highest yield.

A claim from The control of glyphosate-resistant corn in corn replant situations and the effect of nitrogen timing on volunteer corn interference in hybrid corn · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

paraquat (700 g ai ha−1) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha−1) applied at replanting controlled initial corn stands by 96 to 100% and produced highest yield.

Treatment
paraquat (700 g ai ha−1) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha−1) applied at replantinge0
Outcome
control of the initial corn standse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
96 to 100%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clethodim (51 g ai ha−1) applied 6 days prior to replanting, paraquat (700 g ai ha−1) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha−1) applied at replanting, and glufosinate (450 g ai ha−1) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 weeks later provided 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stands and resulted in the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1771
t0

“glyphosate-resistant corn in corn replant situations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–67

Title

The control of glyphosate-resistant corn in corn replant situations and the effect of nitrogen timing on volunteer corn interference in hybrid corn

Ryan M. Terry Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) 2011

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-7fa96e8faaee2ec5f4e12f6d60029cce9d4f9013e00834ac1a39f5afafac7f1c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

paraquat · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

metribuzin · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.