Paper · 2012 · Weed Technology

Corn Replant Situations: Herbicide Options and the Effect of Replanting into Partial Corn Stands

Ryan M. Terry; Tony Dobbels; Mark M. Loux; et al.

11
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Inadequate corn stands due to extreme weather conditions may require producers to replant their corn fields. The use of GR corn, however, can result in difficulty in managing replanted corn without experiencing yield loss. Therefore, the objectives of this research were to evaluate the herbicide options for control of GR corn in a corn replant situation and to determine the effect of corn replanted into various initial corn stands on grain yield. Two field studies were conducted to accomplish the objectives. The first experiment was designed to identify the most efficacious herbicide treatment for GR corn removal in a corn replant situation. Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replanting, paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting, and glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk later provided 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand and resulted in the highest yield. If corn from the first planting remains, the interaction between different sized plants can reduce yield of corn. Thus, a second field experiment was conducted to evaluate the influence on grain yield of corn replanted into various initial corn stands. Corn stands of 0, 20,000, 40,000, 60,000, 80,000, and 100,000 plants ha −1 were established and either followed by a corn replant at 80,000 seeds ha −1 or not replanted. Initial stands ≥ 60,000 plants ha −1 did not require a replant to maximize yield. Initial corn stands ≤ 40,000 plants ha −1 required a replant with initial stand control to maximize grain yield. The percent yield contribution from an initial stand of 20,000 plants ha −1 was 20% greater than the same population replanted a few weeks later, which showed the competitive advantage to earlier planting even at the lowest initial corn stand. Because of this competitive advantage, an initial stand must be removed to maximize corn yield in a replant situation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clethodim applied 6 days before replanting gave 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand.

Treatment
Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replantinge1
Outcome
control of the initial corn stande1
Direction
providede1
Value
96 to 100%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replanting, paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting, and glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk later provided 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand and resulted in the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat plus metribuzin applied at replanting gave 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand.

Treatment
paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replantinge1
Outcome
control of the initial corn stande1
Direction
providede1
Value
96 to 100%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replanting, paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting, and glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk later provided 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand and resulted in the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate with a sequential treatment 3 weeks later gave 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand.

Treatment
glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk latere1
Outcome
control of the initial corn stande1
Direction
providede1
Value
96 to 100%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replanting, paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting, and glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk later provided 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand and resulted in the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clethodim applied before replanting resulted in the highest corn yield.

Treatment
Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replantinge1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replanting, paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting, and glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk later provided 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand and resulted in the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat plus metribuzin applied at replanting resulted in the highest corn yield.

Treatment
paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replantinge1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replanting, paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting, and glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk later provided 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand and resulted in the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate with a sequential treatment resulted in the highest corn yield.

Treatment
glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk latere1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replanting, paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting, and glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk later provided 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand and resulted in the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–982 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial corn stands of 60,000 plants/ha or more did not require replanting to maximise yield.

Outcome
maximize yielde2
Direction
did not requiree2
Qualifier
Initial stands ≥ 60,000 plants ha −1e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replanting, paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting, and glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk later provided 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand and resulted in the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–982 · show in text ↑
e2

“Initial stands ≥ 60,000 plants ha −1 did not require a replant to maximize yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1487 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial corn stands of 40,000 plants/ha or fewer required replanting with initial stand control to maximise grain yield.

Outcome
maximize grain yielde3
Direction
requirede3
Qualifier
initial stand controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replanting, paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting, and glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk later provided 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand and resulted in the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–982 · show in text ↑
e3

“Initial corn stands ≤ 40,000 plants ha −1 required a replant with initial stand control to maximize grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1600 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield contribution from an initial stand of 20,000 plants/ha was 20% greater than the same population replanted a few weeks later.

Treatment
an initial stand of 20,000 plants ha −1e4
Outcome
percent yield contributione4
Direction
greatere4
Value
20%e4
Comparator
the same population replanted a few weeks latere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replanting, paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting, and glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk later provided 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand and resulted in the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–982 · show in text ↑
e4

“The percent yield contribution from an initial stand of 20,000 plants ha −1 was 20% greater than the same population replanted a few weeks later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1746 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier planting gives corn a competitive advantage, even at the lowest initial stand.

Outcome
competitive advantage to earlier plantinge5
Qualifier
even at the lowest initial corn stande5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replanting, paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting, and glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk later provided 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand and resulted in the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–982 · show in text ↑
e5

“which showed the competitive advantage to earlier planting even at the lowest initial corn stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1748–1844 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

An initial stand must be removed to maximise corn yield in a replant situation.

Outcome
maximize corn yielde6
Qualifier
in a replant situatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Clethodim (51 g ai ha −1 ) applied 6 d prior to replanting, paraquat (700 g ai ha −1 ) plus metribuzin (160 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting, and glufosinate (450 g ai ha −1 ) applied at replanting along with a sequential treatment 3 wk later provided 96 to 100% control of the initial corn stand and resulted in the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–982 · show in text ↑
e6

“an initial stand must be removed to maximize corn yield in a replant situation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1885–1963 · show in text ↑

clethodim · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

paraquat · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

glufosinate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

22 papers: 11 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

paraquat · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

clethodim · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

metribuzin · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

glufosinate · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

22 papers: 22 positive, 0 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.