Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Texas panicum control with flufenacet plus metribuzin was below 70% in 1999.

A claim from Flufenacet and Metribuzin Combinations for Weed Control and Corn (Zea mays) Tolerance1 · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Texas panicum control with flufenacet plus metribuzin was below 70% in 1999.

Treatment
flufenacet plus metribuzine0
Interactor
Texas panicume0weed
Outcome
Texas panicum controle0
Value
less than 70%e0
Qualifier
1999e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Texas panicum control with flufenacet plus metribuzin was variable with less than 70% control in 1999 and greater than 75% control in 2000.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–295
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–64

Title

Flufenacet and Metribuzin Combinations for Weed Control and Corn (Zea mays) Tolerance1

W. JAMES GRICHAR; BRENT A. BESLER; KEVIN D. BREWER; et al. Weed Technology 2003. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2003)017[0346:famcfw]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-bfbd48bceac6b1c49a06cb41927d6d675c0bd13901b720c20844ac78de3b937e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

flufenacet · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

metribuzin · control · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.