Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano-silica concentrations did not vary soil salinity.

A claim from Effect of nano silica sized application and different levels of saline irrigation water on soil properties and crop-water productivity of maize and faba bean · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-silica concentrations did not vary soil salinity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar application with different concentrations with nano-silicae0
Outcome
soil salinitye0
Direction
no variationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there are no variations between soil salinity and foliar application with different concentrations with nano-silica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–659
t0

“Effect of nano silica sized application and different levels of saline irrigation water on soil properties and crop-water productivity of maize and faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–157

Title

Effect of nano silica sized application and different levels of saline irrigation water on soil properties and crop-water productivity of maize and faba bean

Megahed Amer Environment, Biodiversity and Soil Security 2018. doi:10.21608/jenvbs.2018.3753.1026

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-7fbb47d419e9ef2fa3cf3f212d6449b6726a0b5b9ae7f4420ae441102560d9f1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.