Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Maize straw potassium content was higher at 1.68%% under residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.

A claim from Nutrient content of maize: Mustard cropping system under residue management practices · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize straw potassium content was higher at 1.68%% under residue incorporation and microbial consortium spray.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
strawe0
Treatment
residue incorporation + spray of microbial consortium on residuee0
Outcome
potassium contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.68%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that the application of residue incorporation + spray of microbial consortium on residue produced significantly higher nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content in seed (1.62, 0.49 and 0.67%) and straw (0.67, 0.24 and 1.68%) in maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–567
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–25

Title

Nutrient content of maize: Mustard cropping system under residue management practices

Dipali Singh; HS Kushwaha International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research 2025. doi:10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i3j.4148

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-8292a8bbff50d3a0987b1ce1a877197e9981d5c0a79c83d2deb86068b2e88ccd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

organic · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 98 positive, 22 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Total copper and zinc increased with sewage sludge application but remained below EC limits.

    Influence of sewage sludge application on soil properties and on the distribution and availability of heavy metal fractions · 1995

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Sludge raised sweet corn forage and grain Cd concentrations about threefold.

    Effect of Municipal Wastes on Crop Yields and Uptake of Heavy Metals · 1975

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Reducing mineral P fertilizer by 20% with maize straw incorporation did not decrease soil labile inorganic P concentration.

    Effects of mineral phosphorus fertilizer reduction and maize straw incorporation on soil phosphorus availability, acid phosphatase activity, and maize grain yield in northeast China · 2020 · compared with 100% mineral P fertilizer was applied without straw addition

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    The two lower sludge rates did not significantly affect heavy metal content of maize leaf and grain.

    Possibilities of using sewage sludge as nitrogen fertilizer for maize · 2006

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Sewage sludge application increased corn leaf cadmium from 0.05-0.1 to 1-3 micrograms per gram.

    Sewage Sludge as a Source of Cadmium in Soil-Plant-Animal Systems · 1979 · compared with 0.05-0.1 ,ug/g

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    High rates of potassium, enhanced by ploughing in crop-residue ash, seriously reduced maize magnesium status.

    Effects of Fertilizers on Exchangeable Cation Ratios and Crop Nutrition in Northern Nigeria · 1976

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Sludge amendment produced corn silage with high cadmium accumulation.

    Performance of Goats and Lambs Fed Corn Silage Produced on Sludge‐Amended Soil · 1983 · compared with 0

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Sewage sludge alone failed to provide appropriate mineral nutrition to maize.

    Evaluation of Suitability of Treated Sewage Sludge for Maize Cultivation · 2020

    Opposite direction

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 151 positive, 10 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Spray timing did not affect plant-part nitrogen content relative to controls.

    Uptake, Distribution, and Remobilization of 15N‐labeled Urea Applied to Maize Canopies1 · 1985 · compared with controls

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Humus did not significantly affect P and Ca uptake.

    Effects of soil applied humic substances to dry weight and mineral nutrients uptake of maize under calcareous soil conditions · 2008

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Low boron use and zinc solution spray did not affect grain boron uptake.

    Application of Different Levels of Zinc and Boron on Concentration and Uptake of Zinc and Boron in the Corn Grain · 2010

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Osmotic stress before or during the absorption period reduced Rb absorption to 20% or less of controls.

    INFLUENCE OF MANNITOL ON ABSORPTION AND RETENTION OF RUBIDIUM BY EXCISED CORN ROOTS · 1973 · compared with controls

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Phosphite application number generally did not change phosphorus concentrations in corn grain, leaf and stem.

    Does phosphite, a reduced form of phosphate contribute to phosphorus nutrition in corn (Zea mays L.)? · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Four foliar CaCl 2 applications increased shoot cadmium concentration relative to two.

    Effects of Ca on growth and some physiological characteristics of maize under Cd stress · 2001 · compared with foliar application CaCl 2 two times

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Leaf nutrient content did not differ before and after chelate application in either hybrid.

    Agronomic characteristics and management of diseases in maize with chelate-based products containing calcium, copper, manganese, and zinc · 2020 · compared with before

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Micronutrient enriched FYM with Jeevamrut gave significantly lower total digestible nutrient in fodder maize.

    Impact of integrated nitrogen management on the nutritional quality of fodder maize · 2025

    Opposite direction

152 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    The presence of microorganisms during preculture and uptake experiments had no significant effect on 59Fe uptake and translocation in Alice and ys1.

    Iron Inefficiency in Maize Mutant ys1 (Zea mays L. cv Yellow-Stripe) Is Caused by a Defect in Uptake of Iron Phytosiderophores · 1994

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Azospirillum inoculation had no consistent benefit for plant nitrogen content.

    Nitrogen Fixation by Corn‐Azospirillum Associations in a Temperate Climate1 · 1981

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    On low organic carbon soils, MCP inoculation did not alter maize nutrient acquisition.

    Maize Inoculation with Microbial Consortia: Contrasting Effects on Rhizosphere Activities, Nutrient Acquisition and Early Growth in Different Soils · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Standard treatment without bacterial inoculation resulted in very low P uptake in the plants.

    Improvement of wheat and cotton growth and nutrient uptake by phosphate solubilizing bacteria. · 2004

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Cu concentrations in inoculated and non-inoculated seedlings did not differ significantly.

    Copper-Resistant Bacteria Enhance Plant Growth and Copper Phytoextraction · 2012 · compared with non-inoculated seedlings

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Pig slurry biofertilizer had no detectable effect on nutrient concentrations in corn leaves and kernels.

    Soil chemical properties and maize yield under application of pig slurry biofertilizer · 2015

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Azospirillum seed inoculation did not significantly affect corn macronutrient content.

    Seed inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense and N fertilization of corn in the Cerrado biome · 2016

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    The 360 mL biofertilizer dose produced lower accumulation of some nutrients than larger doses.

    Growth and nutritional status of maize plants in response to different doses and application frequencies of biofertilizer · 2019 · compared with larger doses

    Opposite direction

297 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.