Intervention effectmodel-written summary

MH-21, a salt-tolerant wheat genotype, showed higher responsiveness to Si application, particularly at 100 mg L-1.

A claim from Improving salinity tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes by foliar and soil applications of silicic acid (H2SiO3) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MH-21, a salt-tolerant wheat genotype, showed higher responsiveness to Si application, particularly at 100 mg L-1.

Material
MH-21e1
Treatment
100 mg L-1 Sie1
Outcome
higher responsiveness to Si applicatione1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–60
e1

“among the salt-tolerant genotypes MH-21 exhibited higher responsiveness to Si application particularly at 100 mg L-1 Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1533

Title

Improving salinity tolerance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes by foliar and soil applications of silicic acid (H2SiO3)

Sobia Akram; Muhammad Anwar-ul-Haq; Muhammad Saqib; et al. Soil & Environment 2024. doi:10.25252/se/2025/253556

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-8714aaf0fdd91ea55fbff91d8f312800b01f84a1ba12a19a100682fe006f6567 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 19 in the model’s answer

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.