Intervention effectmodel-written summary

NAA spray stopped growth and significantly increased spur starch despite fruit presence.

A claim from Comparative studies on physiological and morphological features of bearing and non-bearing spurs of the apple tree. I. Changes in starch content during growth · 1973

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA spray stopped growth and significantly increased spur starch despite fruit presence.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticat0
Treatment
naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA)e0
Outcome
spur starch contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying foliar sprays to on-year trees of succinic acid-2,2-dimethylhydrazide (aminozide) and naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) caused cessation of growth accompanied by a significant increase in the spur starch content despite the presence of fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–625
t0

“apple tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–114

Title

Comparative studies on physiological and morphological features of bearing and non-bearing spurs of the apple tree. I. Changes in starch content during growth

Maria J. Grochowska Journal of Horticultural Science 1973. doi:10.1080/00221589.1973.11514537

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-8a876df712cd0caab15eec670df66d0a884587c6587d6a04b3bcc5cdad81b25b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.