Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation increased mean seed yield by 44%.

A claim from Effect of sowing date, nitrogen and rhizobium inoculation on flowering and development of yield in chickpeas · 1993

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation increased mean seed yield by 44%.

Taxon
chickpeasCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
mean seed yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
44%e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kabuli chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation at 0 and 2 times the recommended rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–211
e2

“Inoculation increased mean seed yield by 44%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–663

Title

Effect of sowing date, nitrogen and rhizobium inoculation on flowering and development of yield in chickpeas

T. I. Verghis; G. D. Hill; B. A. McKenzie 1993

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-8defefcfd74597587dfc8c95d551e030a9730cd4c61a73277b2adad0789f525a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

208 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.