Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined treatment significantly influenced plant dry weight to 162.70 g/plant.

A claim from Influence of biofertilizers and micronutrients on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment significantly influenced plant dry weight to 162.70 g/plant.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
PSB + Azotobacter + zinc Sulphate 30 kg/hae0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Value
162.70 g/plante0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the greater plant height (159.03 cm), plant dry weight (162.70 g/plant), crop growth rate (26.250 g/m2/day), number of cobs per plant (1.8), number of rows per cob (16.8), number of seeds per cob (553.4), higher 100 seed weight (29.3 gm), higher Grain yield (6.5 t/ha) higher straw yield (12.9 t/ha), and Harvest index (33.8) were significantly influenced with the application of PSB + Azotobacter + zinc Sulphate 30 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–990
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75

Title

Influence of biofertilizers and micronutrients on growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.)

Kumar Raj; Rajesh Singh; Akankhya Pradhan International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2024. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2024.v7.i4d.547

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-91c2097f257a03df0f675cc77e320c04bd2b7f93f9b5395dcb3dc467a4df97e1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

zinc sulfate · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

56 papers: 52 positive, 4 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

38 papers: 38 positive, 0 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.