Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AMF plus rock phosphate with 21 day irrigation gave highest wheat growth and yield traits.

A claim from Applying of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and rock phosphate to wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) grown on calcareous soil and irrigated at different irrigation intervals and effect of plant growth and soil physical properties · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF plus rock phosphate with 21 day irrigation gave highest wheat growth and yield traits.

Taxon
wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume1
Treatment
AMF + RP and irrigation every 21 dayse0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
growth and yield characterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AMF + RP and irrigation every 21 days gave highest values of most growth and yield characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–959
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–433

Title

Applying of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and rock phosphate to wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) grown on calcareous soil and irrigated at different irrigation intervals and effect of plant growth and soil physical properties

Y El-Edfawy; M Havey; H El-Kotb; et al. Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor 2016. doi:10.21608/assjm.2016.112688

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-91c7cedd3f01690c7e514c7c09d5d0a0e0bd89e0b0070c473d1e1d29ce4a03ee · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 95 positive, 8 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Low AM fungal colonisation did not affect early wheat growth, pre-anthesis P and Zn uptake, or yield.

    Increasing mycorrhizal colonisation does not improve growth and nutrition of wheat on Vertosols in south-eastern Australia · 2002

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    AMF inoculation did not increase wheat grain or shoot yields under metal treatments.

    Potential of AM Fungi in Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals and Effect on Yield of Wheat Crop · 2014

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    AMF seed coating did not improve N assimilation, grain yield or root weight of wheat, and the N assimilation benefit was not visible even without N

    Improving nitrogen use efficiency using precision nitrogen management in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2021

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Mycorrhizal wheat had no yield penalty across soil treatments.

    Response of wheat to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation and biochar application: Implications for soil carbon sequestration · 2024

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    AM inoculum reduced yield in ploughed plots from 4.3 to 3.5 t ha −1.

    Experimental evaluation of biological regeneration of arable soil: The effects of grass-clover leys and arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculants on wheat growth, yield, and shoot pathology · 2022

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    AMF inoculation did not increase wheat yield under elevated ozone.

    [Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal effects on wheat growth in response to elevated tropospheric O3 concentration]. · 2009

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Plots with foliar phosphorus but without mycorrhiza had the minimum grain yield of 6.67 ton ha -1.

    Wheat performance as affected by pre-plant and foliar application of phosphorus under inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and non-inoculation · 2014

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Overall growth and yield of spring wheat did not differ greatly between organic and conventional AM fungal inocula.

    Different wheat cultivars exhibit variable responses to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from organic and conventional farms · 2020 · compared with conventional AM fungal inocula

    No difference from an alternative

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

572 papers: 524 positive, 48 negative or no effect

523 papers in the same direction as this claim · 43 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Higher phosphorus increased yield and its components.

    EFFECT OF IRRIGATION INTERVALS, PHOSPHORUS LEVELS AND ANTIOXIDANTS OF FOLIAR ASCORBIC AND CITRIC ACID (ASCOBIN) APPLICATION ON MAIZE AND WHEAT CROPS AND SOME SOIL PROPERTIES · 2012

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Low phosphorus stress reduced tiller number in Kenong 199 wheat.

    Transcriptome analysis of axillary buds in low phosphorus stress and functional analysis of TaWRKY74s in wheat · 2024

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    RAC875 had higher grain yield than Wyalkatchem at maturity under low phosphorus.

    Variation in root system architecture and morphology of two wheat genotypes is a predictor of their tolerance to phosphorus deficiency · 2019

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  4. no effect
    Neither nitrogen nor phosphorus produced a significant grain yield response.

    Water use, growth and yield of wheat in a subtropical environment · 1980

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nano-N with 75% conventional N gave wheat and maize grain yield at par with full conventional fertilizer.

    Changes in microbial community structure and yield responses with the use of nano-fertilizers of nitrogen and zinc in wheat–maize system · 2024 · compared with N 100 PK

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Incorporating P and K into the subsoil did not further change wheat yield.

    The effects of subsoiling and deep incorporation of P and K fertilizers on the yield and nutrient uptake of barley, potatoes, wheat and sugar beet grown in rotation · 1979

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Applications of multiple nutrients did not significantly increase wheat yield.

    Evidence for the involvement of the root lesion nematode Pratylenchus thornei in wheat yield decline in northern New South Wales · 1987

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization did not significantly influence kernels per head or kernel weight.

    Adventitious Roots, Tillers, and Grain Yields of Spring Wheat as Influenced by N‐P Fertilization1 · 1970

    Opposite direction

563 papers more in this group

See all 572 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.

    Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.

    Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.

    Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.

    Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    DI water saving had no effect on wheat yield.

    Yield and water productivity of maize and wheat under deficit and raised bed irrigation practices in Egypt · 2012

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Limited irrigation yielded 99% of full irrigation for winter wheat.

    Cropping Systems for Stretching Limited Irrigation Supplies · 1993 · compared with fully irrigated

    Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.