Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Acetochlor/flumetsulan/clopyralid followed by nicosulfuron plus dicamba/diflufenzopyr consistently controlled broadleaf weeds.

A claim from Evaluation of two‐pass herbicide programs for broad‐spectrum weed control in conventional tillage non‐transgenic corn production in Wisconsin atrazine prohibition areas · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acetochlor/flumetsulan/clopyralid followed by nicosulfuron plus dicamba/diflufenzopyr consistently controlled broadleaf weeds.

Treatment
acetochlor/flumetsulan/clopyralid fb nicosulfuron + dicamba/diflufenzopyre0
Outcome
broadleaf controle1
Direction
most consistente1
Value
85%–100%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“acetochlor/flumetsulan/clopyralid fb nicosulfuron + dicamba/diflufenzopyr (85%–100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1346
e1

“provided the most consistent broadleaf control across all site‐years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1348–1416
t0

“corn production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128

Title

Evaluation of two‐pass herbicide programs for broad‐spectrum weed control in conventional tillage non‐transgenic corn production in Wisconsin atrazine prohibition areas

Ahmadreza Mobli; Ryan P. DeWerff; Nicholas J. Arneson; et al. Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment 2023. doi:10.1002/agg2.20419

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-93e89d96bcc8eb82fe4d44ab8744b3aa357e7faa66e99bce039b560a9a968f92 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

clopyralid · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

acetochlor · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nicosulfuron · control · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.