Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Straw incorporation had no obvious effect on soil available N increment over years versus removal under PFMC.

A claim from Long-term impacts of nitrogen fertilization and straw incorporation on rice production and nitrogen recovery efficiency under plastic film mulching cultivation · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw incorporation had no obvious effect on soil available N increment over years versus removal under PFMC.

Treatment
RSIe0
Outcome
soil available Ne0
Direction
no obvious promotion effecte0
Comparator
RSRe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RSI had no obvious promotion effect on the increment of yield, grain NRE, and soil available N with years compared with RSR in PFMC system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1153
e1

“late growth period of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–180

Title

Long-term impacts of nitrogen fertilization and straw incorporation on rice production and nitrogen recovery efficiency under plastic film mulching cultivation

Yan Sun; Mengjie Zhu; Wenhai Mi; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1806303

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-9503d4128d8e1cf36e2faefe86a078759e093dc3ec6681a17c5b794041fc4a94 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

organic · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 60 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.