Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar spraying of three fertilizers significantly increased chlorophyll content (SPAD), soluble solid content and reduced ascorbic acid in grapes.

A claim from A comparative study on the application effect of three kinds of foliar fertilizer on two varieties of grapes in Xinjiang · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying of three fertilizers significantly increased chlorophyll content (SPAD), soluble solid content and reduced ascorbic acid in grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
spraying Amino acid chelated Calcium liquid fertilizer,humic acid liquid fertilizer and balanced nutrientse0
Outcome
chlorophyll content(SPAD value)e0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
at different growth stagese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Verbatim

e0

“spraying Amino acid chelated Calcium liquid fertilizer,humic acid liquid fertilizer and balanced nutrients at different growth stages of the grapes could significantly increase the chlorophyll content(SPAD value),yield,soluble solid content and the reduced ascorbic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–554

Title

A comparative study on the application effect of three kinds of foliar fertilizer on two varieties of grapes in Xinjiang

Wang Yue-jin Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu 2010

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-95d899c80bde63dcfa3fcfd8920174cfff4d2302479afcbba58d6922c573afa0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

amino acid · physiology: pigments · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

calcium atom · physiology: pigments · VitisResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · VitisPositive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.