Paper · 2010 · Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu

A comparative study on the application effect of three kinds of foliar fertilizer on two varieties of grapes in Xinjiang

Wang Yue-jin

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was conducted on the effects of three kinds of foliar fertilizer on the yield and quality on the Red Globe grape and Munage grape,with a view to provide theoretical basis and practical guidance for effective foliar fertilization in the grape production.The result showed that spraying Amino acid chelated Calcium liquid fertilizer,humic acid liquid fertilizer and balanced nutrients at different growth stages of the grapes could significantly increase the chlorophyll content(SPAD value),yield,soluble solid content and the reduced ascorbic acid,and it could also significantly reduce the titratable acid content,in which the effect of taking four times amino acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizer on Red Globe grape and Munage grape could get the best effect,and the yield increase was respectively 8.50% and 17.15%,and the quality of grape treated by acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizer was also better than other two kinds of spray fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying of three fertilizers significantly increased chlorophyll content (SPAD), soluble solid content and reduced ascorbic acid in grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
spraying Amino acid chelated Calcium liquid fertilizer,humic acid liquid fertilizer and balanced nutrientse0
Outcome
chlorophyll content(SPAD value)e0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
at different growth stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“spraying Amino acid chelated Calcium liquid fertilizer,humic acid liquid fertilizer and balanced nutrients at different growth stages of the grapes could significantly increase the chlorophyll content(SPAD value),yield,soluble solid content and the reduced ascorbic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying of three fertilizers significantly increased grape yield.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
spraying Amino acid chelated Calcium liquid fertilizer,humic acid liquid fertilizer and balanced nutrientse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“spraying Amino acid chelated Calcium liquid fertilizer,humic acid liquid fertilizer and balanced nutrients at different growth stages of the grapes could significantly increase the chlorophyll content(SPAD value),yield,soluble solid content and the reduced ascorbic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar fertilizers significantly reduced the titratable acid content of grapes.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Amino acid chelated Calcium liquid fertilizer,humic acid liquid fertilizer and balanced nutrientse0
Outcome
titratable acid contente1
Direction
reducee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“spraying Amino acid chelated Calcium liquid fertilizer,humic acid liquid fertilizer and balanced nutrients at different growth stages of the grapes could significantly increase the chlorophyll content(SPAD value)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–496 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly reduce the titratable acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four sprays of amino acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizer gave the best effect, with a yield increase of 8.50% in Red Globe grape.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Red Globe grapee0
Treatment
four times amino acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8.50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of taking four times amino acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizer on Red Globe grape and Munage grape could get the best effect,and the yield increase was respectively 8.50% and 17.15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four sprays of amino acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizer gave the best effect, with a yield increase of 17.15% in Munage grape.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Munage grapee0
Treatment
four times amino acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
17.15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of taking four times amino acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizer on Red Globe grape and Munage grape could get the best effect,and the yield increase was respectively 8.50% and 17.15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grape quality under acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizer was better than under the other two spray fertilizers.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizere0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other two kinds of spray fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“the quality of grape treated by acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizer was also better than other two kinds of spray fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–960 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

amino acid · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

amino acid · physiology: pigments · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

amino acid · yield · VitisResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

calcium atom · physiology: pigments · VitisResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

calcium atom · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

calcium atom · yield · VitisResults agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.