Paper · 2008 · Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology

Effect of Fertilizing N and Amino Acid on Physiological Characteristics of Grapevine Leaves

Chang Yong-yi

7
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This experiment has studied physiological change of grapevine leaves after fertilized N and amino acid.The result showed that content of chlorophyll,activities of SOD and POD were increased,and conductivity and MDA content were declined compare to CK 10 days after treated.Content of chlorophyll and conductivity of 4.0 g/kg urea+200 times amino acid were 1.31 mg/g and 69.23% higher than of the check,which were 0.92 mg/g higher and 30.32 points percentage lower than of the check,while the effect was the most remarkable,and content of chlorophyll was the highest,conductivity was lowest of 4.0 g/kg urea+200 times amino acid in all treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization increased chlorophyll content and SOD and POD activity after ten days.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
Fertilizing N and Amino Acidt0
Outcome
content of chlorophyll,activities of SOD and PODe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“content of chlorophyll,activities of SOD and POD were increased,and conductivity and MDA content were declined compare to CK 10 days after treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Fertilizing N and Amino Acid on Physiological Characteristics of Grapevine Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization decreased conductivity and MDA content.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
Fertilizing N and Amino Acidt0
Outcome
conductivity and MDA contente0
Direction
declinede0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conductivity and MDA content were declined compare to CK 10 days after treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Fertilizing N and Amino Acid on Physiological Characteristics of Grapevine Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“content of chlorophyll,activities of SOD and POD were increased,and conductivity and MDA content were declined compare to CK 10 days after treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4.0 g/kg urea plus amino acid treatment gave chlorophyll content of 1.31 mg/g.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
4.0 g/kg urea+200 times amino acide0
Outcome
Content of chlorophylle0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.31 mg/ge0
Comparator
checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Content of chlorophyll and conductivity of 4.0 g/kg urea+200 times amino acid were 1.31 mg/g and 69.23% higher than of the check,which were 0.92 mg/g higher and 30.32 points percentage lower than of the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Fertilizing N and Amino Acid on Physiological Characteristics of Grapevine Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“content of chlorophyll,activities of SOD and POD were increased,and conductivity and MDA content were declined compare to CK 10 days after treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave conductivity of 69.23%.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
4.0 g/kg urea+200 times amino acide0
Outcome
conductivitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
69.23%e0
Comparator
checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Content of chlorophyll and conductivity of 4.0 g/kg urea+200 times amino acid were 1.31 mg/g and 69.23% higher than of the check,which were 0.92 mg/g higher and 30.32 points percentage lower than of the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Fertilizing N and Amino Acid on Physiological Characteristics of Grapevine Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“content of chlorophyll,activities of SOD and POD were increased,and conductivity and MDA content were declined compare to CK 10 days after treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll was 0.92 mg/g higher than check.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
Fertilizing N and Amino Acidt0
Outcome
chlorophylle1
Direction
highere0
Value
0.92 mg/ge0
Comparator
checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which were 0.92 mg/g higher and 30.32 points percentage lower than of the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Fertilizing N and Amino Acid on Physiological Characteristics of Grapevine Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“content of chlorophyll,activities of SOD and POD were increased,and conductivity and MDA content were declined compare to CK 10 days after treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conductivity was 30.32 percentage points below check.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
Fertilizing N and Amino Acidt0
Outcome
conductivitye1
Direction
lowere0
Value
30.32 points percentagee0
Comparator
checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“which were 0.92 mg/g higher and 30.32 points percentage lower than of the check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 402–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Fertilizing N and Amino Acid on Physiological Characteristics of Grapevine Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“content of chlorophyll,activities of SOD and POD were increased,and conductivity and MDA content were declined compare to CK 10 days after treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–272 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4.0 g/kg urea plus amino acid treatment had highest chlorophyll and lowest conductivity among treatments.

Taxon
grapevineVitist0
Treatment
4.0 g/kg urea+200 times amino acide0
Outcome
content of chlorophyll was the highest,conductivity was loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“content of chlorophyll was the highest,conductivity was lowest of 4.0 g/kg urea+200 times amino acid in all treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Fertilizing N and Amino Acid on Physiological Characteristics of Grapevine Leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e1

“content of chlorophyll,activities of SOD and POD were increased,and conductivity and MDA content were declined compare to CK 10 days after treated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–272 · show in text ↑

amino acid · physiology: oxidative · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

amino acid · physiology: pigments · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · VitisPositive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

fertilization · physiology: oxidative · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.