Paper · 2015 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effect of the Different Fertilizing Methods of the Amino Acid Fertilizer on the Nutritional Quality of the Grape

Kong Xiao-pin

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The research aimed to improve the quality and yield of Red Globe grape cultivation.[Method]The fruit grain weight,spike weight,soluble solids and Vc content were increased and the titratable acid content was declined compare to CK.The effect of the treatment based on soil application and foliage dressing was better than others.[Result]In the process of determinating total cyanide,the influence of laboratory reagents and operational factors on the determine results were bigger.Operation must be carefully,try one's best to avoid artificial effect.When calibrating a solution,it should be noted titration endpoint,increasing the number of parallel samples,to prevent excessive deviation.In the reagent preparation,try to pay attention to the exact concentration of the reagent.[Conclusion] The study provides the theoretical basis for the fertilizer management of grape.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid fertilizer increased grape fruit grain weight and spike weight compared with CK.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
Amino Acid Fertilizert0
Outcome
fruit grain weight,spike weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

t0

“Amino Acid Fertilizer on the Nutritional Quality of the Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fruit grain weight,spike weight,soluble solids and Vc content were increased and the titratable acid content was declined compare to CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid fertilizer increased soluble solids and Vc content of grape compared with CK.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
Amino Acid Fertilizert0
Outcome
soluble solids and Vc contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

t0

“Amino Acid Fertilizer on the Nutritional Quality of the Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fruit grain weight,spike weight,soluble solids and Vc content were increased and the titratable acid content was declined compare to CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid fertilizer lowered the titratable acid content of grape compared with CK.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
Amino Acid Fertilizert0
Outcome
titratable acid contente0
Direction
declinede0
Comparator
CKe0

Verbatim

t0

“Amino Acid Fertilizer on the Nutritional Quality of the Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fruit grain weight,spike weight,soluble solids and Vc content were increased and the titratable acid content was declined compare to CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–242 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment combining soil application and foliage dressing of the fertilizer had a better effect than the other treatments.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
soil application and foliage dressinge0
Outcome
better than otherse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
otherse0

Verbatim

t0

“Amino Acid Fertilizer on the Nutritional Quality of the Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“The effect of the treatment based on soil application and foliage dressing was better than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–340 · show in text ↑

amino acid · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

amino acid · molecular: metabolites · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

amino acid · yield · VitisResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

40 papers: 32 positive, 8 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

53 papers: 45 positive, 8 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.