Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under T9, straw yield was highest at 44.46 q ha-1.

A claim from Effect of Different Foliar Application of Nutrients on Growth Characters, Yield Contributing Characters and Yield of Gram · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under T9, straw yield was highest at 44.46 q ha-1.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
GRDF + 1 foliar spray of Phule Liquid Micronutrient Grade II @ 1% at 35 DASe1
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
44.46 q ha-1e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effect of different foliar application of nutrients on growth, yield and quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 32–145
e1

“Then the highest grain yield (29.21 q ha-1), straw yield (44.46 q ha-1), biological yield (73.67 q ha-1), harvest index (39.64%) and yield increase over control (85.81%) were recorded in treatment T9 i.e. GRDF + 1 foliar spray of Phule Liquid Micronutrient Grade II @ 1% at 35 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1301

Title

Effect of Different Foliar Application of Nutrients on Growth Characters, Yield Contributing Characters and Yield of Gram

C. A. Kale; R. M. Gethe; N. J. Danawale; et al. Journal of Agriculture Research and Technology 2024. doi:10.56228/jart.2024.49209

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-9cdee8a17e78fa71b46459cb48e54279a1c9c6841813c3dd94d4cf39bf896532 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

168 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.