Paper · 2021 · Feeds and Feed Production

Symbiotic activity of chickpea plants depending on the technological methods of cultivation

Viktor Mazur; Ihor Didur; Hanna Pantsyreva; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Purpose. Establishment of the effect of seed inoculation with bacterial preparations and foliar dressing with micronutrient fertilization on the symbiotic productivity of chickpea varieties in the Right-Bank ForestSteppe. Methods. During the research, the following methods were used: field; statistical. Results. The results of the research on the effect of bacterial preparations as well as foliar microfertilizer application at different stages of organogenesis on nodules formation, their mass and nitrifying ability of chickpea Pegasus and Triumph varieties are presented. As a result of foliar fertilization, the mass of nodules in chickpea varieties gradually increased, which was caused by the process of photosynthesis intensification and, accordingly, an increase in the amount of assimilation elements in the formed nodules. It has been established that high indicators of symbiotic productivity in chickpea plants were observed when seeds were inoculated with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv in combination with two foliar feeding with microfertilizer Urozhay Bobovi. Observation of the dynamics of accumulation of the number and weight of nodules showed that the maximum indicators during the growing season of chickpea were recorded in the phase of complete flowering. During the formation of the indicators of the number and mass of nodules, the varietal differences of chickpea were established. Maximum rate of knobs formation, their mass and nitrogenase activity (in the variety Pegasus – 41.3 pcs/plant, 0.92 g/plant, 4573 nmol ethylene/plant, in the variety Triumph – 37.9 pcs/plant, 0.72 g/plant, 4301 nmol ethylene/plant) were observed in the variant with the presowing treatment of seeds with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv with two foliar feedings with microfertilizer Urozhai Bobovi. Conclusions. For the maximum realization of the genetic potential of chickpea Pegasus and Triumph varieties, the technology of its cultivation should envisage sowing with seeds, treated with biological preparations in combination with bioconstructor and carrying out two top dressing with microfertilizer application to plants in the phase of intensive growth and budding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with Rizoline + Rizoseiv combined with two foliar feedings of microfertilizer gave high symbiotic productivity in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
inoculated with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv in combination with two foliar feeding with microfertilizer Urozhay Bobovie1
Interactor
Rizoline + Rizoseive1symbiont
Outcome
symbiotic productivitye1
Direction
highe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e1

“It has been established that high indicators of symbiotic productivity in chickpea plants were observed when seeds were inoculated with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv in combination with two foliar feeding with microfertilizer Urozhay Bobovi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization gradually increased the mass of nodules in chickpea varieties.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
nodulese2
Treatment
foliar fertilizatione2
Outcome
mass of nodulese2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
graduallye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e2

“As a result of foliar fertilization, the mass of nodules in chickpea varieties gradually increased, which was caused by the process of photosynthesis intensification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–743 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The increase in nodule mass is attributed to photosynthesis intensification in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
mass of nodulese2
Qualifier
the process of photosynthesis intensificatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e2

“As a result of foliar fertilization, the mass of nodules in chickpea varieties gradually increased, which was caused by the process of photosynthesis intensification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–743 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number and weight of nodules in chickpea reached their maximum in the phase of complete flowering.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Organ / stage
phase of complete floweringe3
Outcome
number and weight of nodulese3
Direction
maximume3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e3

“Observation of the dynamics of accumulation of the number and weight of nodules showed that the maximum indicators during the growing season of chickpea were recorded in the phase of complete flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1295 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea varieties differed in the number and mass of nodules formed.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
varietal differencese4
Qualifier
the number and mass of nodulese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e4

“During the formation of the indicators of the number and mass of nodules, the varietal differences of chickpea were established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pegasus had a maximum rate of nodule formation of 41.3 pcs/plant under the bacterial and foliar treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Pegasuse5
Treatment
presowing treatment of seeds with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv with two foliar feedings with microfertilizer Urozhai Bobovie5
Interactor
Rizoline + Rizoseive5symbiont
Outcome
rate of knobs formatione5
Direction
Maximume5
Value
41.3 pcs/plante5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum rate of knobs formation, their mass and nitrogenase activity (in the variety Pegasus – 41.3 pcs/plant, 0.92 g/plant, 4573 nmol ethylene/plant, in the variety Triumph – 37.9 pcs/plant, 0.72 g/plant, 4301 nmol ethylene/plant) were observed in the variant with the presowing treatment of seeds with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv with two foliar feedings with microfertilizer Urozhai Bobovi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pegasus had a maximum nodule mass of 0.92 g/plant under the bacterial and foliar treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Pegasuse5
Treatment
presowing treatment of seeds with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv with two foliar feedings with microfertilizer Urozhai Bobovie5
Interactor
Rizoline + Rizoseive5symbiont
Outcome
masse5
Direction
Maximume5
Value
0.92 g/plante5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum rate of knobs formation, their mass and nitrogenase activity (in the variety Pegasus – 41.3 pcs/plant, 0.92 g/plant, 4573 nmol ethylene/plant, in the variety Triumph – 37.9 pcs/plant, 0.72 g/plant, 4301 nmol ethylene/plant) were observed in the variant with the presowing treatment of seeds with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv with two foliar feedings with microfertilizer Urozhai Bobovi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pegasus had a maximum nitrogenase activity of 4573 nmol ethylene/plant under the bacterial and foliar treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Pegasuse5
Treatment
presowing treatment of seeds with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv with two foliar feedings with microfertilizer Urozhai Bobovie5
Interactor
Rizoline + Rizoseive5symbiont
Outcome
nitrogenase activitye5
Direction
Maximume5
Value
4573 nmol ethylene/plante5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum rate of knobs formation, their mass and nitrogenase activity (in the variety Pegasus – 41.3 pcs/plant, 0.92 g/plant, 4573 nmol ethylene/plant, in the variety Triumph – 37.9 pcs/plant, 0.72 g/plant, 4301 nmol ethylene/plant) were observed in the variant with the presowing treatment of seeds with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv with two foliar feedings with microfertilizer Urozhai Bobovi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triumph had a maximum rate of nodule formation of 37.9 pcs/plant under the bacterial and foliar treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Triumphe5
Treatment
presowing treatment of seeds with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv with two foliar feedings with microfertilizer Urozhai Bobovie5
Interactor
Rizoline + Rizoseive5symbiont
Outcome
rate of knobs formatione5
Direction
Maximume5
Value
37.9 pcs/plante5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum rate of knobs formation, their mass and nitrogenase activity (in the variety Pegasus – 41.3 pcs/plant, 0.92 g/plant, 4573 nmol ethylene/plant, in the variety Triumph – 37.9 pcs/plant, 0.72 g/plant, 4301 nmol ethylene/plant) were observed in the variant with the presowing treatment of seeds with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv with two foliar feedings with microfertilizer Urozhai Bobovi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triumph had a maximum nodule mass of 0.72 g/plant under the bacterial and foliar treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Triumphe5
Treatment
presowing treatment of seeds with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv with two foliar feedings with microfertilizer Urozhai Bobovie5
Interactor
Rizoline + Rizoseive5symbiont
Outcome
masse5
Direction
Maximume5
Value
0.72 g/plante5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum rate of knobs formation, their mass and nitrogenase activity (in the variety Pegasus – 41.3 pcs/plant, 0.92 g/plant, 4573 nmol ethylene/plant, in the variety Triumph – 37.9 pcs/plant, 0.72 g/plant, 4301 nmol ethylene/plant) were observed in the variant with the presowing treatment of seeds with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv with two foliar feedings with microfertilizer Urozhai Bobovi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triumph had a maximum nitrogenase activity of 4301 nmol ethylene/plant under the bacterial and foliar treatment.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
Triumphe5
Treatment
presowing treatment of seeds with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv with two foliar feedings with microfertilizer Urozhai Bobovie5
Interactor
Rizoline + Rizoseive5symbiont
Outcome
nitrogenase activitye5
Direction
Maximume5
Value
4301 nmol ethylene/plante5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–37 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum rate of knobs formation, their mass and nitrogenase activity (in the variety Pegasus – 41.3 pcs/plant, 0.92 g/plant, 4573 nmol ethylene/plant, in the variety Triumph – 37.9 pcs/plant, 0.72 g/plant, 4301 nmol ethylene/plant) were observed in the variant with the presowing treatment of seeds with the bacterial preparation Rizoline + Rizoseiv with two foliar feedings with microfertilizer Urozhai Bobovi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1836 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea cultivation should combine seed treatment with biological preparations and two top dressings with microfertilizer to realize genetic potential.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume6
Organ / stage
the phase of intensive growth and buddinge6
Treatment
biological preparations in combination with bioconstructore6
Outcome
maximum realization of the genetic potentiale6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“For the maximum realization of the genetic potential of chickpea Pegasus and Triumph varieties, the technology of its cultivation should envisage sowing with seeds, treated with biological preparations in combination with bioconstructor and carrying out two top dressing with microfertilizer application to plants in the phase of intensive growth and budding.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1851–2210 · show in text ↑

fertilization · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

48 papers: 43 positive, 5 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

application · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 69 positive, 4 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

application · physiology: enzyme activity · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.