Intervention effectmodel-written summary

FYM with microbial inoculation advanced potato emergence.

A claim from Influence of microorganisms inoculation on nutrient economy in Potatoradish crop sequence in North Western Himalayas · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM with microbial inoculation advanced potato emergence.

Treatment
FYM @ 5 t/ha along with microorganisms inoculatione0
Interactor
microorganismse0symbiont
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
earlye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM @ 5 t/ha along with microorganisms inoculation helped in early emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–539
t0

“Influence of microorganisms inoculation on nutrient economy in Potatoradish crop sequence in North Western Himalayas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–116

Title

Influence of microorganisms inoculation on nutrient economy in Potatoradish crop sequence in North Western Himalayas

M. K. Jatav; Manoj Kumar; S. P. Trehan; et al. Vegetable Science 2012

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-9d3fcdaa2c6147b7f26d57e5548cca703692cb17933ac887963e38b6251d9f6f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

104 papers: 82 positive, 22 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

95 papers more in this group

See all 104 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

140 papers: 122 positive, 18 negative or no effect

121 papers in the same direction as this claim · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

131 papers more in this group

See all 140 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.