Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Encapsulated diclosulam gave a 2.01 benefit cost ratio in late Rabi.

A claim from Novel method to manage weeds in the rainfed groundnut (var. VRI 8 and TMV 14) using nano encapsulated herbicide formulations · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Encapsulated diclosulam gave a 2.01 benefit cost ratio in late Rabi.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
diclosulam @ 25 g ha-1 with encapsulatione0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.01e0
Qualifier
late Rabie0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher profitability was obtained in diclosulam @ 25 g ha-1 with encapsulation (T7) (1.80 and 2.01 B:C ratio during (Kharif and late Rabi respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1334–1485
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–53

Title

Novel method to manage weeds in the rainfed groundnut (var. VRI 8 and TMV 14) using nano encapsulated herbicide formulations

S. Swetha; C. R. Chinnamuthu; P. Murali Arthanari; et al. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2022. doi:10.31018/jans.v14i4.3920

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-9d8bfddd8cec71d06ab3ac1189639c2d21304a1a2641e5b2e08204ba76750f1e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

Diclosulam · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

29 papers: 22 positive, 7 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

in vitro · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.