Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Twice mechanical weeding raised grain yield and NPK uptake relative to weedy check.

A claim from Productivity and economics of wheat (Triticum Aestivum) as influenced by weed management and seed rate · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice mechanical weeding raised grain yield and NPK uptake relative to weedy check.

Treatment
mechanical weeding twice at 15 and 30 DASe0
Outcome
grain yield and NPK uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mechanical weeding twice at 15 and 30 DAS proved the most effective treatment in reducing weeds dry weight which was on a par with sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha, and gave significantly higher grain yield and NPK uptake by wheat than weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1110
t0

“wheat (Triticum Aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55

Title

Productivity and economics of wheat (Triticum Aestivum) as influenced by weed management and seed rate

S. N. Sharma; Rajesh Kumar Singh Progressive Agriculture 2011

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-a11fcbbd2797debfdf12bd0fe7cf485e1c187ee89452c233afeee0fa247fe49c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this claim · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

554 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.