Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Reduced fertilization under recycled wastewater increased Leccino oil TPC by more than 25% versus recommended fertilization.

A claim from Effects of reclaimed wastewater irrigation and fertigation level on olive oil composition and quality · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced fertilization under recycled wastewater increased Leccino oil TPC by more than 25% versus recommended fertilization.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Material
Leccinoe0
Treatment
RWW irrigation with reduced fertilization (Re–)e0
Outcome
TPCe0
Direction
highere0
Value
25%e0
Comparator
treatments with the recommended fertilizatione0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher TPC were observed in oils obtained from RWW irrigation with reduced fertilization (Re–) as compared to the treatments with the recommended fertilization [freshwater irrigation (Fr) and RWW irrigation (Re+) with standard dose of fertilizers], where the TPC increment exceeded 70% in Barnea and 25% in Leccino”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1257
t0

“olive oil composition and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–101

Title

Effects of reclaimed wastewater irrigation and fertigation level on olive oil composition and quality

Loai Basheer; Arnon Dag; Uri Yermiyahu; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2019. doi:10.1002/jsfa.9911

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-a2c878271ac8bb451c3f31cad33e4412e4117f2db3f8c2cf90bc4a39ca54f415 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

irrigation · quality: phytochemicals · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.