Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Solution No. 2 raised Mirror F 1 ascorbic acid content to 78.79 mg%.

A claim from Efficiency of nutrient solutions with different concentration in the cultivation of white cabbage seedlings · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution No. 2 raised Mirror F 1 ascorbic acid content to 78.79 mg%.

Treatment
nutrient solution No. 2e1
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
78.79 mg%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ascorbic acid (78.79 mg%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1203
t0

“white cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107
e1

“The nutrient solution No. 2 of hybrid plants Mirror F 1 stimulated the development of roots, their weight exceeded the control indicators (without fertilizers) by 37.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1064

Title

Efficiency of nutrient solutions with different concentration in the cultivation of white cabbage seedlings

E N Blagorodova; N I Varfolomeeva; A S Zvyagina; et al. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/845/1/012051

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-a66a9f3003bddb79fb231d88e3fa549dbacc178f14597630669081bcb5a5526c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.