Paper · 2021 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Efficiency of nutrient solutions with different concentration in the cultivation of white cabbage seedlings

E N Blagorodova; N I Varfolomeeva; A S Zvyagina; et al.

9
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Fertilizers help to fill the missing nutritional elements for plants and affect their growth and the future crop. The paper presents the results of conducted studies on the effect of nutrient solution concentration on morphological and biochemical indicators of white cabbage seedlings. The seedlings of two early-ripe cabbage hybrids – Mirror F 1 and Tiara F 1 – were grown in peat substrate trays. A nutrient solution of 50 ppm (No.1) and 150 ppm (No.2) was used to feed the seedlings twice during the growing period. The obtained results showed the differences in experimental variants in terms of the height of seedling plants, the number of leaves and leaf-area duration, the weight and volume of the root system, total solids, content of sugar, ascorbic acid. The varietal reaction of cabbage seedlings to the introduction of root feeds with different concentrations was revealed. The nutrient solution No. 2 of hybrid plants Mirror F 1 stimulated the development of roots, their weight exceeded the control indicators (without fertilizers) by 37.3%, and the volume – by 37.8%, contributed to the increase of the content of solids (8.27%), general sugar (0.53%), ascorbic acid (78.79 mg%). When fed with nutrient solution No. 2 the seedlings of Tiara F1 hybrid were characterized by a large leaf-area duration, which exceeds the control by 1.3 times, and the indicators of the root system. The plants of this seedlings consisted of 49.5% of the root system. The chemical analysis of water in greenhouse farming for irrigation of plants showed that it contains various macro- and microelements that are necessary for the growth of vegetable seedlings. The concentration of the nutrient solution did not significantly affect the content of macroelements in the seedlings. When using nutrient solution No. 2, an increase in the plants of the two studied phosphorus hybrids was noted, a deficit of which is very often observed when growing seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution No. 2 increased Mirror F 1 root weight by 37.3% versus unfertilized controls.

Material
Mirror F 1e0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
nutrient solution No. 2e0
Outcome
weighte0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
37.3%e0
Comparator
control indicators (without fertilizers)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nutrient solution No. 2 of hybrid plants Mirror F 1 stimulated the development of roots, their weight exceeded the control indicators (without fertilizers) by 37.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“white cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution No. 2 increased Mirror F 1 root volume by 37.8%.

Material
Mirror F 1e1
Treatment
nutrient solution No. 2e1
Outcome
volumee0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
37.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and the volume – by 37.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“white cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nutrient solution No. 2 of hybrid plants Mirror F 1 stimulated the development of roots, their weight exceeded the control indicators (without fertilizers) by 37.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution No. 2 raised Mirror F 1 solids content to 8.27%.

Treatment
nutrient solution No. 2e1
Outcome
content of solidse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8.27%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contributed to the increase of the content of solids (8.27%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“white cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nutrient solution No. 2 of hybrid plants Mirror F 1 stimulated the development of roots, their weight exceeded the control indicators (without fertilizers) by 37.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution No. 2 raised Mirror F 1 general sugar content to 0.53%.

Treatment
nutrient solution No. 2e1
Outcome
general sugare0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
0.53%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“general sugar (0.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“white cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nutrient solution No. 2 of hybrid plants Mirror F 1 stimulated the development of roots, their weight exceeded the control indicators (without fertilizers) by 37.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution No. 2 raised Mirror F 1 ascorbic acid content to 78.79 mg%.

Treatment
nutrient solution No. 2e1
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
78.79 mg%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ascorbic acid (78.79 mg%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“white cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nutrient solution No. 2 of hybrid plants Mirror F 1 stimulated the development of roots, their weight exceeded the control indicators (without fertilizers) by 37.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution No. 2 increased Tiara F1 leaf-area duration 1.3-fold versus control.

Material
Tiara F1e0
Treatment
nutrient solution No. 2e1
Outcome
leaf-area duratione0
Direction
exceedse0
Value
1.3 timese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seedlings of Tiara F1 hybrid were characterized by a large leaf-area duration, which exceeds the control by 1.3 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1364 · show in text ↑
t0

“white cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nutrient solution No. 2 of hybrid plants Mirror F 1 stimulated the development of roots, their weight exceeded the control indicators (without fertilizers) by 37.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1064 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots comprised 49.5% of the Tiara F1 seedlings under solution No. 2.

Material
Tiara F1e1
Treatment
nutrient solution No. 2e2
Outcome
root systeme0
Value
49.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants of this seedlings consisted of 49.5% of the root system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“white cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“the seedlings of Tiara F1 hybrid were characterized by a large leaf-area duration, which exceeds the control by 1.3 times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1364 · show in text ↑
e2

“The nutrient solution No. 2 of hybrid plants Mirror F 1 stimulated the development of roots, their weight exceeded the control indicators (without fertilizers) by 37.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient solution concentration did not significantly affect seedling macroelement content.

Treatment
concentration of the nutrient solutione0
Outcome
content of macroelementse0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of the nutrient solution did not significantly affect the content of macroelements in the seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1783 · show in text ↑
t0

“white cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution No. 2 increased phosphorus in both studied cabbage hybrids.

Treatment
nutrient solution No. 2e0
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When using nutrient solution No. 2, an increase in the plants of the two studied phosphorus hybrids was noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1894 · show in text ↑
t0

“white cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 35 positive, 12 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 127 positive, 19 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

264 papers: 240 positive, 24 negative or no effect

239 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

260 papers more in this group

See all 264 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.