Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Solution No. 2 raised Mirror F 1 solids content to 8.27%.

A claim from Efficiency of nutrient solutions with different concentration in the cultivation of white cabbage seedlings · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution No. 2 raised Mirror F 1 solids content to 8.27%.

Treatment
nutrient solution No. 2e1
Outcome
content of solidse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
8.27%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contributed to the increase of the content of solids (8.27%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1153
t0

“white cabbage seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–107
e1

“The nutrient solution No. 2 of hybrid plants Mirror F 1 stimulated the development of roots, their weight exceeded the control indicators (without fertilizers) by 37.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1064

Title

Efficiency of nutrient solutions with different concentration in the cultivation of white cabbage seedlings

E N Blagorodova; N I Varfolomeeva; A S Zvyagina; et al. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science 2021. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/845/1/012051

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-b9b3e1797a91e5fbee2a62600164f50710ad7d7a098b1e67ffb0cb6977a67787 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 35 positive, 12 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.