Claim · model-written summary
Mil-16 inoculation had little adverse effect on early growth or fruit development rate over the first five trusses.
- Taxon
- tomato crops
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Inoculation with Mil‐16e4
- Outcome
- early growth or the rate of fruit developmente4
- Qualifier
- little adverse effecte4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Inoculation with Mil‐16 had little adverse effect on early growth or the rate of fruit development on the first five trusses”
t0“early glasshouse tomato crops”
Title
A. G. CHANNON; N. J. CHEFFINS; G. M. HITCHON; et al. Annals of Applied Biology 1978. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1978.tb00686.x
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Inoculation with the Mil-16 attenuated TMV strain at seedling stage raised tomato fruit yield by 5-8-9-4% over uninoculated plants that became naturally infected.
- Intervention effect Inoculation with Mil-16 gave higher gross financial returns from tomato (up to 25p per plant) than uninoculated plants.
- Intervention effect Tomato plants protected by Mil-16 yielded up to 14% more than plants artificially inoculated with the indigenous severe virus.
- Intervention effect In 1973 the final yield of Mil-16 inoculated tomato plants was about 5% lower than that of plants substantially free from infection for 14 weeks after planting.
- Intervention effect Mil-16 inoculation gave no benefit to cv. Cudlow Cross in a one-year test.