Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Intercropping with mungbean increased net returns by 12.5% over sole pigeonpea in the second season.

A claim from Effect of planting systems and phosphorus with bio-fertilizers on the performance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) under rainfed conditions · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping with mungbean increased net returns by 12.5% over sole pigeonpea in the second season.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
intercroppedt0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
12.5%e0
Qualifier
respectivelye0
Comparator
solet0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sole and intercropped pigeonpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–116
e0

“In term of net returns, the increase was 12.6 and 12.5% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1364

Title

Effect of planting systems and phosphorus with bio-fertilizers on the performance of sole and intercropped pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) under rainfed conditions

PRAMOD KUMAR; K.S. RANA; D.S. RANA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v57i2.4624

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-a80c64be02dd12e086b4a26c49edeb7541bf8bb23913bd7efd423a804b4b69ce · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

108 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.