Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar sulfur increased soybean yield by 614 kg ha-1 relative to the control.

A claim from Macro and micronutrient contents in grain and soybean yield [Glycine max (L). Merr.] after foliar application of elemental sulfur · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sulfur increased soybean yield by 614 kg ha-1 relative to the control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
application of foliar sulfure0
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
614 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soybean yield increased 614 kg ha-1 with the application of foliar sulfur in relation to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–958

Title

Macro and micronutrient contents in grain and soybean yield [Glycine max (L). Merr.] after foliar application of elemental sulfur

Neto, Michel Esper; Besen, Marcos Renan; Coneglian, Carolina Fedrigo; et al. Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP) 2019. doi:10.19084/rca17268

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-a94807e9b4aee7ca0be65962de9c87ebd6eabe1c2c3a33dc1c5c0b52d8fc3f33 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

92 papers: 76 positive, 16 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Sulfur decreased soybean yields.

    Soil pH, Excess Lime, and Chelating Agent on Micronutrients in Soybeans and Bush Beans1 · 1974

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Clark isoline with S yielded significantly less than Clark

    Agronomic Performance of Selected Soybean Morphological Variants in Irrigation Culture with Two Row Spacings1 · 1980 · compared with Clark

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Sulfur application did not significantly affect soybean yield.

    Yield, nutrient, and soil sulfur response to ammonium sulfate fertilization of soybean cultivars1 · 1993

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Sulfur addition did not increase soybean grain yield, independent of S source.

    Impact of sulfur application on soybean yield and quality in New York · 2021

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Added sulfur had no effect on soybean grain yield.

    Effects of sulfur application on yield and composition of soybeans and soil sulfur · 1981

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Seed N and seed weight were not affected by S rate in either corn or soybean.

    Corn and soybean response to sulfur fertilizer in West Tennessee · 2021

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Sulphur fertilization had no significant effect on soybean yield or dry matter accumulation.

    Effects of irrigation and sulphur application on soybeans grown on a Norfolk Loamy sand · 1981

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Fertilization did not affect seed yield.

    Nitrogen and Sulfur Fertilization in Soybean: Impact on Seed Yield and Quality · 2020

    Opposite direction

83 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

404 papers: 332 positive, 72 negative or no effect

331 papers in the same direction as this claim · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Vapor and/or spray drift that caused soybean terminal bud kill reduced soybean yields.

    Dicamba Volatility · 1979

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Foliar fungicides did not affect soybean seed yield.

    Effect of Fungicide on Soybean Growth and Yield · 2009

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Foliar 2,4-D had little effect on soybean yield at prebloom.

    Response of Soybeans to 2,4-D, Dicamba, and Picloram · 1969

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Foliar fertilization did not significantly affect seed yield.

    Effect of Foliar Fertilization on Photosynthesis, Leaf Nutrition, and Yield of Soybeans1 · 1978

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    K-polyphosphate mix foliar spraying reduced soybean yield by 10.9% on average over two sites.

    Foliage Injury, Nutrient Intake, and Yield of Soybeans as Influenced by Foliar Fertilization1 · 1980

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Mineral N applied at the R5.3 stage, foliar or as topdressing, did not increase soybean grain yield in four field experiments.

    Mineral nitrogen impairs the biological nitrogen fixation in soybean of determinate and indeterminate growth types · 2017

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Soil or foliar Fe or Mn did not change soybean root or shoot dry matter yield.

    Influence of foliar and soil applications of iron and manganese on soybean dry matter yield and iron-manganese relationship in a Calcareous soil · 2011

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Preharvest treatments, spray volume, and surfactant concentration did not affect soybean yield or harvestable losses.

    Herbicide Combinations for Preharvest Weed Desiccation in Early Maturing Soybean (Glycine max) · 1998

    Opposite direction

395 papers more in this group

See all 404 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.