Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cadmium up-regulated APX and GST transcription.

A claim from Antioxidant activity and gene expression associated with cadmium toxicity in wheat affected by mycorrhizal fungus · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium up-regulated APX and GST transcription.

Treatment
Cd exposuree0
Gene
APX and GSTe0
Outcome
transcription of APX and GSTe0
Direction
up-regulatede0

Not reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In response to Cd exposure, transcriptional level of CAT was decreased but, transcription of APX and GST was up-regulated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–646
t0

“wheat affected by mycorrhizal fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–113

Title

Antioxidant activity and gene expression associated with cadmium toxicity in wheat affected by mycorrhizal fungus

Saleh Shahabivand; Hassan Zare Maivan; Ebrahim Mahmoudi; et al. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 2016. doi:10.13080/z-a.2016.103.007

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-a9a00bc13a0aa2f03c62757a2df107f4f58639830607bf7ec2dd208b35cedf03 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

cadmium atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 7 positive, 13 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

heavy metal · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 6 positive, 12 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.