Intervention effectmodel-written summary

EM spray increased soybean seed yield.

A claim from Effects of foliar application with effective microorganisms on leaf metabolism and seed yield in soybean. · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EM spray increased soybean seed yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
spraying EMe0
Interactor
EMe0symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying EM increased seed protein and crude fat concentration and increased seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–969
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104

Title

Effects of foliar application with effective microorganisms on leaf metabolism and seed yield in soybean.

Shousong Yue; Cuiping Wang; Xu HuiLian; et al. 2003

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-b169fcb4428e5fbe67d290588bc89365d7566be9b153c2ca8100227ddf29494c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

404 papers: 332 positive, 72 negative or no effect

331 papers in the same direction as this claim · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Vapor and/or spray drift that caused soybean terminal bud kill reduced soybean yields.

    Dicamba Volatility · 1979

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Foliar fungicides did not affect soybean seed yield.

    Effect of Fungicide on Soybean Growth and Yield · 2009

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Foliar 2,4-D had little effect on soybean yield at prebloom.

    Response of Soybeans to 2,4-D, Dicamba, and Picloram · 1969

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Foliar fertilization did not significantly affect seed yield.

    Effect of Foliar Fertilization on Photosynthesis, Leaf Nutrition, and Yield of Soybeans1 · 1978

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    K-polyphosphate mix foliar spraying reduced soybean yield by 10.9% on average over two sites.

    Foliage Injury, Nutrient Intake, and Yield of Soybeans as Influenced by Foliar Fertilization1 · 1980

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Mineral N applied at the R5.3 stage, foliar or as topdressing, did not increase soybean grain yield in four field experiments.

    Mineral nitrogen impairs the biological nitrogen fixation in soybean of determinate and indeterminate growth types · 2017

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Soil or foliar Fe or Mn did not change soybean root or shoot dry matter yield.

    Influence of foliar and soil applications of iron and manganese on soybean dry matter yield and iron-manganese relationship in a Calcareous soil · 2011

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Preharvest treatments, spray volume, and surfactant concentration did not affect soybean yield or harvestable losses.

    Herbicide Combinations for Preharvest Weed Desiccation in Early Maturing Soybean (Glycine max) · 1998

    Opposite direction

395 papers more in this group

See all 404 papers →

inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 491 positive, 75 negative or no effect

490 papers in the same direction as this claim · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Inoculation did not significantly change soybean seed yield in either year.

    Persistence and Recovery of Rhizobium japonicum Inoculum in a Field Soil1 · 1984

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Across 63 environments, inoculants did not produce a soybean yield response significantly different from zero relative to untreated control.

    Probability of Yield Response to Inoculants in Fields with a History of Soybean · 2010 · compared with an untreated control

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Soybean soybean seed yield was unaffected by additional soil inoculation at V4 inoculation.

    Soybean yield, biological N2 fixation and seed composition responses to additional inoculation in the United States · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Inoculants did not significantly affect soybean seed yield on relatively high nitrogen soils.

    Yield and N Content of Soybean Seed as Influenced by Rhizobium japonicum Inoculants Possessing the Hydrogenase Characteristic1 · 1981

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Inoculation did not significantly affect seed yield.

    Effects of Soil Water on Rhizobium japonicum Infection, Nitrogen Accumulation, and Yield in Bragg Soybeans1 · 1981

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Inoculum did not increase soybean yield at 10 of 12 field locations.

    Impact of Inoculation and Use of Fertilizer Nitrogen on Soybean Production Where Growing Seasons Are Short · 1990

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    GEM96 nodulation enhancement in Merlin did not increase field grain yield.

    Enhanced Soybean Productivity by Inoculation With Indigenous Bradyrhizobium Strains in Agroecological Conditions of Northeast Germany · 2022

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Production of foliage and seed nitrogen was satisfactory irrespective of inoculation rate in rhizobia-high plots.

    Low survival of Rhizobium japonicum inoculant leads to reduced nodulation, nitrogen fixation and yield of soybean in the current crop but not in the subsequent crop · 1987

    Opposite direction

557 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.