Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pruning increased cluster number, yield, TSS, sugar and anthocyanin content relative to control.

A claim from Impact of pruning severity, chicken manure, and foliar application of kare combi on productivity and quality of zaitouni grape cultivar (Vitis vinifera L.) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning increased cluster number, yield, TSS, sugar and anthocyanin content relative to control.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
pruninge0
Outcome
No of clusters, counterweight yield per vine as well as TSSe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“Impact of pruning severity, chicken manure, and foliar application of kare combi on productivity and quality of zaitouni grape cultivar (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155
e0

“No of clusters, counterweight yield per vine as well as TSS, total sugar percentage, and Anthocyanin content, were increased significantly by pruning, chicken manure, and foliar application of kare-combi as compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–804

Title

Impact of pruning severity, chicken manure, and foliar application of kare combi on productivity and quality of zaitouni grape cultivar (Vitis vinifera L.)

Shawkat M. Mohammed Al-Atrushy; R. Mohammed Ibrahim Mağallaẗ zirāʿaẗ al-rāfidayn 2023. doi:10.33899/mja.2023.139718.1231

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-b31f1f84fdddcf5cb4b33b7e3f755b9f9427d633b72df84bd906e0982a2aaae4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

pruning · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

61 papers: 41 positive, 20 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.