Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 125 % nitrogen through sulphur coated urea gave millable cane yield on par with neem coated urea, 123.1 t/ha.

A claim from Effect of Slow Releasing Nitrogen Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Sugarcane · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 125 % nitrogen through sulphur coated urea gave millable cane yield on par with neem coated urea, 123.1 t/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
125 % nitrogen through sulphur coated ureae0
Outcome
millable cane yielde0
Direction
onpare0
Value
123.1 t/hae0
Comparator
125 % nitrogen through neem coated areae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Slow Releasing Nitrogen Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–78
e0

“application of 125 % nitrogen through neem coated area recorded significantly maximum plant height (304.1 cm) and higher millable cane yield (125.3 t/ha) and which was onpar with the application of 125 % nitrogen through sulphur coated urea (302.5 cm and 123.1 t/ha, respectively) and application of 125 % nitrogen through coal tar coated urea (300.2 cm and 121.4 t/ha, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–670

Title

Effect of Slow Releasing Nitrogen Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Sugarcane

Manjunatha Bhanuvally; Y.M. Ramesha; H. Yogeeshappa International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2017. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.610.070

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-b4cdaeec47ace53f031cebdb40275c51daacccbd1c083465dc42f2151cd4844d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

sulfur atom · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Sodium, iron and sulfur produced no appreciable yield increases.

    FACTORS AFFECTING THE SUCROSE CONTENT OF SUGARCANE: FERTILIZERS · 1952

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Sulphur fertilization did not significantly vary cane yield.

    Effect of concentrated organic manure, nitrogen and sulphur on the productivity and economics of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) · 2001

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    A higher sulphur dose (80 kg/ha) negatively impacted sugarcane growth and yield.

    EFFECT OF SULPHUR, ZINC AND BORON FERTILIZATION ON SUGARCANE GROWTH, YIELD, SUGAR RECOVERY AND QUALITY OF CANE JUICE AND JAGGERY · 2025

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Sugarcane yields increased linearly in the plant crop with sulfur application.

    SULFUR APPLICATION EFFECTS ON SOIL PROPERTIES IN A CALCAREOUS SOIL AND ON SUGARCANE GROWTH AND YIELD · 2011

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Sulfur application increased sugarcane yield per hectare compared with control.

    Effect of Sulfur on Sugarcane Yield and Quality at the Heavy Clay Soil “Vertisols” of Sudan · 2014 · compared with control

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Land-equivalent ratio increased with sulphur.

    Competition functions and productivity in sugarcane-based associative and successive cropping systems in relation to nitrogen and sulphur nutrition · 2002

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Potassium, magnesium and sulphur applications significantly increased sugarcane yield.

    Effect of fertilizer application and the main nutrient limiting factors for yield and quality of sugarcane production in Guangxi red soil · 2005

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Sulphur applied to the plant crop improved ratoon yield.

    Effect of sulphur on productivity and quality of sugarcane plant and ratson crops grown in sugarcane (plant)-ratoon-wheat (Triticum aestivum) system on IGP alluvial soils · 2001

    Same direction

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Drip-applied nitrogen yielded not significantly different sugarcane yields from sidedress application.

    Sugarcane Responses to Irrigation and Nitrogen in Semiarid South Texas · 2008 · compared with sidedress application

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Excess nitrogen lowered sugarcane yield.

    Different Amounts of Nitrogen Fertilizer Applications Alter the Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure in the Rhizosphere Soil of Sugarcane · 2021

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Reducing nitrogen from 120 to 80 kg N ha−1 had limited potential to lower yield by about 1%.

    Effect of previous soil management on sugarcane response to nitrogen fertilization · 2018

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Nitrogen above the yield optimum lowered sugar yields.

    Growth and yield responses to amending the sugarcane monoculture: interactions between break history and nitrogen fertiliser · 2014

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Urea applied on the surface gave significantly lower cane and sucrose yields than ammonium sulphate and sulphur-coated urea on a calcareous soil.

    Comparison of sulphur-coated urea and ammonium sulphate amended with N-Serve as sources of nitrogen for sugarcane · 1975 · compared with AS and SCU

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Urea formulation did not affect sugarcane yield at the same nitrogen application rate.

    Effects of urea formulation on sugarcane yield, nitrogen uptake and nitrous oxide emission in tropical Queensland. · 2014

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Nitrogen doses did not affect sugarcane stalk yield.

    Stalk yield and nitrogen (15N) recovery of irrigated sugarcane during the plant-cane cycle using urea · 2017

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Low nitrogen doses in three or four applications did not reduce sugarcane production.

    NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IN SUGARCANE AND ITS INFLUENCE ON YIELD, PROFITABILITY AND LEACHING LOSSES · 2011

    Opposite direction

128 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.