Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combining inoculants with 0.21 kg ha -1 cobalt significantly increased groundnut N, P, and K uptake relative to individual applications.

A claim from Performance of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea Linn) under nitrogen fixing and phosphorus solubilizing microbial inoculants with different levels of cobalt in alluvial soils of eastern India · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining inoculants with 0.21 kg ha -1 cobalt significantly increased groundnut N, P, and K uptake relative to individual applications.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
both inoculants and cobalt applied at 0.21 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
uptake of N, P and Ke0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
individual application of either inoculants or cobalte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield and uptake of N, P and K by groundnut was significantly higher in the treatments receiving both inoculants and cobalt applied at 0.21 kg ha -1 than individual application of either inoculants or cobalt.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1231

Title

Performance of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea Linn) under nitrogen fixing and phosphorus solubilizing microbial inoculants with different levels of cobalt in alluvial soils of eastern India

Manisha Basu; P. B. S. Bhadoria Agronomy Research 2008

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-b4f2900fc6f50cc7e2bb7808c86ea85d91cd41bf345845201f4ededf36936ffe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

cobalt atom · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 55 positive, 1 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.