Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrapyrin increased corn yields by up to 207%, averaging 68%.

A claim from Stalk Rot Incidence and Yield of Corn as Affected by Inhibiting Nitrification of Fall‐applied Ammonium1 · 1975

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrapyrin increased corn yields by up to 207%, averaging 68%.

Treatment
0.55 kg of nitrapyrin/ha with fall‐applied anhydrous ammoniae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
207%e0
Qualifier
average increase was 68%e0
Comparator
anhydrous ammonia without the nitrification inhibitore0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields were increased as much as 207% (average increase was 68%) as a result of applying 0.55 kg of nitrapyrin/ha with fall‐applied anhydrous ammonia when compared to yields obtained with anhydrous ammonia without the nitrification inhibitor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1413

Title

Stalk Rot Incidence and Yield of Corn as Affected by Inhibiting Nitrification of Fall‐applied Ammonium1

H. L. Warren; D. M. Huber; D. W. Nelson; et al. Agronomy Journal 1975. doi:10.2134/agronj1975.00021962006700050018x

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-b824c4dddccc40ae560c63e201cb630ccbb6b4ce61916d17da0b4bb181b5d666 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nitrapyrin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

43 papers: 34 positive, 9 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

ammonia · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.