Paper · 1975 · Agronomy Journal

Stalk Rot Incidence and Yield of Corn as Affected by Inhibiting Nitrification of Fall‐applied Ammonium1

H. L. Warren; D. M. Huber; D. W. Nelson; et al.

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
40
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Large overwinter losses of fall‐applied fertilizer N from midwestern U.S. soils occur through leaching and denitrification. These losses result in decreased efficiency in the utilization of applied N and often in lower crop yields. Of the various management techniques available to reduce N losses, previous studies with spring‐applied N suggested that inhibiting nitrification of applied ammonium with specific chemicals appears to be most compatible with current fertilization and crop production practices. We tested the effectiveness of a specific nitrification inhibitor, 2‐chloro‐6‐(trichloromethyl)pyridine (nitrapyrin), in reducing losses of fall‐applied N by comparing the growth, disease incidence, and yield of corn growing in field plots receiving anhydrous ammonia with those treated with anhydrous ammonia containing the inhibitor. Three field experiments on two soil types (Typic Argivdoll coarse‐loamy, mixed mesic and Vertic Halpla‐quoll fine, montmorillonitic, mesic) demonstrated that inhibition of nitrification of fall‐applied ammonium markedly increased grain yields and grain protein and decreased the incidence of stalk rot in corn. Corn yields were increased as much as 207% (average increase was 68%) as a result of applying 0.55 kg of nitrapyrin/ha with fall‐applied anhydrous ammonia when compared to yields obtained with anhydrous ammonia without the nitrification inhibitor. In all experiments, stalk rot incidence in corn was reduced as a result of inhibition of nitrification — the reductions varied from 60 to 96%. In two experiments, grain protein content was increased by 7 to 38% as a result of application of nitrapyrin with fall‐applied N. The results of this study indicate that severe losses of N may occur as a result of fall application of N fertilizers and that these losses may be markedly reduced by using a nitrification inhibitor to minimize the formation of nitrate. The increased yield and grain protein obtained from nitrapyrin addition likely resulted from greater availability of N in nitrapyrin‐treated plots. The reduction in stalk rot may have resulted from altered N metabolism in plants growing in nitrapyrin‐treated plots because of the uptake of substantial amounts of ammonium. This was indicated since stalk rot was reduced by nitrapyrin in plots which were not under N stress. Another explanation for reduced stalk rot may reside in the fact that nitrapyrin‐treated plots had more vigorous plants than plots not receiving the nitrification inhibitor. The data also suggest that N application rates used for corn production may be decreased with no loss in yield if a nitrification inhibitor is used to minimize losses of applied N.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibiting nitrification increased grain yields.

Treatment
inhibition of nitrification of fall‐applied ammoniume0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments on two soil types (Typic Argivdoll coarse‐loamy, mixed mesic and Vertic Halpla‐quoll fine, montmorillonitic, mesic) demonstrated that inhibition of nitrification of fall‐applied ammonium markedly increased grain yields and grain protein and decreased the incidence of stalk rot in corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibiting nitrification increased grain protein.

Treatment
inhibition of nitrification of fall‐applied ammoniume0
Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments on two soil types (Typic Argivdoll coarse‐loamy, mixed mesic and Vertic Halpla‐quoll fine, montmorillonitic, mesic) demonstrated that inhibition of nitrification of fall‐applied ammonium markedly increased grain yields and grain protein and decreased the incidence of stalk rot in corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibiting nitrification decreased incidence of stalk rot.

Treatment
inhibition of nitrification of fall‐applied ammoniume0
Outcome
incidence of stalk rote0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
field experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three field experiments on two soil types (Typic Argivdoll coarse‐loamy, mixed mesic and Vertic Halpla‐quoll fine, montmorillonitic, mesic) demonstrated that inhibition of nitrification of fall‐applied ammonium markedly increased grain yields and grain protein and decreased the incidence of stalk rot in corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrapyrin increased corn yields by up to 207%, averaging 68%.

Treatment
0.55 kg of nitrapyrin/ha with fall‐applied anhydrous ammoniae0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
207%e0
Qualifier
average increase was 68%e0
Comparator
anhydrous ammonia without the nitrification inhibitore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn yields were increased as much as 207% (average increase was 68%) as a result of applying 0.55 kg of nitrapyrin/ha with fall‐applied anhydrous ammonia when compared to yields obtained with anhydrous ammonia without the nitrification inhibitor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrification inhibition reduced stalk rot incidence by 60 to 96%.

Treatment
inhibition of nitrificatione0
Outcome
stalk rot incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
60 to 96%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all experiments, stalk rot incidence in corn was reduced as a result of inhibition of nitrification — the reductions varied from 60 to 96%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrapyrin with fall-applied N raised grain protein by 7 to 38%.

Treatment
application of nitrapyrin with fall‐applied Ne0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7 to 38%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In two experiments, grain protein content was increased by 7 to 38% as a result of application of nitrapyrin with fall‐applied N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1686 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 33–37 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed yield and protein gains to greater nitrogen availability.

Treatment
nitrapyrin additione0
Outcome
increased yield and grain proteine0
Qualifier
greater availability of Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased yield and grain protein obtained from nitrapyrin addition likely resulted from greater availability of N in nitrapyrin‐treated plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1924–2071 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 33–37 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed altered N metabolism as a reason for reduced stalk rot.

Treatment
nitrapyrin‐treated plotse0
Outcome
reduction in stalk rote0
Qualifier
altered N metabolisme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in stalk rot may have resulted from altered N metabolism in plants growing in nitrapyrin‐treated plots because of the uptake of substantial amounts of ammonium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2072–2246 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 33–37 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed greater plant vigor as another explanation for reduced stalk rot.

Treatment
nitrapyrin‐treated plotse0
Outcome
reduced stalk rote0
Qualifier
more vigorous plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Another explanation for reduced stalk rot may reside in the fact that nitrapyrin‐treated plots had more vigorous plants than plots not receiving the nitrification inhibitor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2348–2521 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 33–37 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest reducing N application rates when using a nitrification inhibitor without yield loss.

Treatment
nitrification inhibitore0
Outcome
N application rates used for corn production may be decreased with no loss in yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The data also suggest that N application rates used for corn production may be decreased with no loss in yield if a nitrification inhibitor is used to minimize losses of applied N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2522–2702 · show in text ↑

nitrapyrin · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

nitrapyrin · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

43 papers: 34 positive, 9 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

ammonia · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrogen · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

52 papers: 27 positive, 25 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

181 papers: 164 positive, 17 negative or no effect

163 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

177 papers more in this group

See all 181 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.