Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Adding cyanazine or atrazine improved fall panicum control by 26%.

A claim from ICIA-0051 for Postemergence Weed Control in Conventional Corn (Zea Mays) · 1991

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding cyanazine or atrazine improved fall panicum control by 26%.

Treatment
cyanazine or atrazine at 1.1 kg ha -1e0
Interactor
fall panicumPanicum dichotomiflorume0weed
Outcome
fall panicume0
Direction
improvede0
Value
26%e0
Comparator
ICIA-0051e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Panicum dichotomiflorum
Panicum dichotomiflorum · InteractorAyotte, Gilles, 1948- · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn (Zea Mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–72
e0

“The addition of cyanazine or atrazine at 1.1 kg ha -1 to the lowest rate (0.3 kg ha -1 ) of ICIA-0051 also improved large crabgrass, yellow foxtail, and fall panicum control by 9, 7, and 26%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–699

Title

ICIA-0051 for Postemergence Weed Control in Conventional Corn (Zea Mays)

Krishna N. Reddy; Prasanta C. Bhowmik Weed Technology 1991. doi:10.1017/s0890037x0002724x

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-b9d9c2b5692f0e7239e928c3884d63a27c231b23a87402b4963f73850712ead8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

atrazine · Panicum dichotomiflorum · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

cyanazine · Panicum dichotomiflorum · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.