Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zinc fertilization increased peanut economic benefits by 1 142.25~1 262.25 yuan/hm2.

A claim from Effect of Zinc Fertilization Dosages to Yield and Benefit of Peanut Fenghua 1 · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc fertilization increased peanut economic benefits by 1 142.25~1 262.25 yuan/hm2.

Treatment
zinc fertilizatione0
Outcome
economic benefitse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1 142.25~1 262.25 yuan/hm2e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zinc fertilization can obviously improve the economic traits of peanut plant,en-large the pod yield by 5.51%~6.57% and increase the economic benefits by 1 142.25~1 262.25 yuan/hm2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 161–340

Title

Effect of Zinc Fertilization Dosages to Yield and Benefit of Peanut Fenghua 1

YU Song-xi Shanxi nongye kexue 2010

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-bacc7701b02efd4e925e33c4bbc12de8978c150a16ce789a0f7597997a0af0c3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

68 papers: 65 positive, 3 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this claim · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

674 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.