Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The mineral soil, mycorrhizae and 80% terra preta treatment ranked best for seed, cob and husk wet and dry weight.

A claim from The effect of Terra preta media using pirolysis system on growth and production of corn (Zea mays L) · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mineral soil, mycorrhizae and 80% terra preta treatment ranked best for seed, cob and husk wet and dry weight.

Treatment
T5 treatment: mineral soil + 15gr mycorrhizae + 80% terra pretae0
Interactor
mycorrhizaee0symbiont
Outcome
corn seed, corn cob and corn huske0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On observation of the number of leaves, of wet weight and dry weight of root, canopy, corn seed, corn cob and corn husk of T5 treatment: mineral soil + 15gr mycorrhizae + 80% terra preta showed the best treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1522

Title

The effect of Terra preta media using pirolysis system on growth and production of corn (Zea mays L)

A. Sutopo; Yuliyanto Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) 2020. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4242769

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-bb420aa9bbbbbed2c804ebc1e0db5f3919833e82bc4fab074be269da2975bddf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

mycorrhiza · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.