Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T1 and T2 did not differ significantly on studied maize traits.

A claim from Effect of Mycorrhiza Fungi, Preceding Crops, Mineral and Bio Fertilizers on Maize Intercropping with Cowpea · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T1 and T2 did not differ significantly on studied maize traits.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
T2 (75% NPK + arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMFs))e0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMFs)e0symbiont
Outcome
all studied characters of maizee0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
T1 (100% NPK mineral)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences were found between fertilizer treatments T1 (100% NPK mineral) and T2 (75% NPK + arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMFs)) combination on all studied characters of maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1167

Title

Effect of Mycorrhiza Fungi, Preceding Crops, Mineral and Bio Fertilizers on Maize Intercropping with Cowpea

Atef A. M. Zen El-Dein; Mohamed H. M. Koriem; Moodi Saham Alsubeie; et al. Agriculture 2022. doi:10.3390/agriculture12111934

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-cd58eb601076edbf00ee83013dd4962bb42d86157f34ab9310703007202f80d5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

162 papers: 137 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 137 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

153 papers more in this group

See all 162 papers →

mycorrhiza · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.