Intervention effectmodel-written summary

K fertilizer did not affect Na concentrations except in the last harvest.

A claim from The Effect of Formulation and Amount of Potassium Fertilizer on Macromineral Concentration and Cation-Anion Difference in Tall Fescue · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K fertilizer did not affect Na concentrations except in the last harvest.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume0
Treatment
Application of K fertilizere1
Outcome
Na concentrationse1
Direction
did not affecte1
Qualifier
except in the last harveste1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–318
e1

“Application of K fertilizer increased the K concentration in all 5 harvests but did not affect Na concentrations except in the last harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1503

Title

The Effect of Formulation and Amount of Potassium Fertilizer on Macromineral Concentration and Cation-Anion Difference in Tall Fescue

M.L. Swift; S. Bittman; D.E. Hunt; et al. Journal of Dairy Science 2007. doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(07)71593-x

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-bc1e1de3cf38d3b556ec173add6c5135d948126b415a599ac9afd484cd280c76 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.