Claim · model-written summary
Silencing GmRAR1 and GmSGT1-2 impaired systemic acquired resistance.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- Silencing GmRAR1 and GmSGT1-2e0
- Outcome
- systemic acquired resistance (SAR)e0
- Direction
- impairede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Silencing GmRAR1 and GmSGT1-2 impaired resistance to virulent bacteria and systemic acquired resistance (SAR) in soybean”
Title
Da-Qi Fu; Said Ghabrial; Aardra Kachroo Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 2008. doi:10.1094/mpmi-22-1-0086
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Mechanism Soybean ETI required RAR1 and SGT1 but not HSP90.
- Intervention effect Silencing GmRAR1 and GmSGT1-2 compromised Rsv1-mediated resistance to Soybean mosaic virus.
- Intervention effect Silencing GmRAR1 and GmSGT1-2 compromised resistance to Pseudomonas syringae.
- Observation Soybean RAR1 and SGT1 proteins interacted with each other and two HSP90 proteins.
- Intervention effect Silencing GmHSP90 or GmRAR1 altered plant morphology.
- Intervention effect Silencing GmRAR1 and GmSGT1-2 impaired resistance to virulent bacteria.
- Observation The Arabidopsis rar1 mutant had a defect in systemic acquired resistance.