Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seven days of drought reduced photochemical quenching.

A claim from PSII Photochemistry and Antioxidant Responses of a Chickpea Variety Exposed to Drought · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven days of drought reduced photochemical quenching.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
drought-stressed for 7 dayse0
Outcome
photochemical quenchinge0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants drought-stressed for 7 days brought about a marked increase in non-photochemical energy dissipation and a marked decline in photochemical quenching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–929
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–59

Title

PSII Photochemistry and Antioxidant Responses of a Chickpea Variety Exposed to Drought

Tuǧçe Kalefetoǧlu Macar; Yasemin Ekmekçi Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 2008. doi:10.1515/znc-2008-7-820

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-c3a5b05b4e64e0d3f7d001fb20886a1285602768eab10f20f4eade2601158995 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.