Intervention effectmodel-written summary

IBA did not stimulate root formation in hard-to-root olive cultivars.

A claim from Relationship of Carbohydrate Sources and Indole-3-Butyric Acid in Olive Cuttings · 1995

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA did not stimulate root formation in hard-to-root olive cultivars.

Taxon
OliveOlea europaeat0
Material
hard-to-root cultivarse0
Treatment
Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) treatmente0
Outcome
root formatione0
Direction
does not stimulatee0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Carbohydrate Sources and Indole-3-Butyric Acid in Olive Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–80
e0

“Indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) treatment improves rooting of easy-to-root and moderate-rooting olive cultivars, but does not stimulate root formation in hard-to-root cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–172

Title

Relationship of Carbohydrate Sources and Indole-3-Butyric Acid in Olive Cuttings

Z Wiesman; S Lavee Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 1995. doi:10.1071/pp9950811

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-c46999f852977c91aabd80ff8c6b5c3a271d098d89bd5afdff609b37a781d2eb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.