Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spraying sugar beet with Azospirillum increased sugar beet productivity.

A claim from Influence of bacteria of the genus Azospirillum on sugar beet productivity · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying sugar beet with Azospirillum increased sugar beet productivity.

Treatment
Spraying of sugar beet plants with nitrogen-fixing strains of bacteria of the genus Azospirillume1
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume1symbiont
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“on sugar beet productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–74
e1

“Spraying of sugar beet plants with nitrogen-fixing strains of bacteria of the genus Azospirillum promotes activation of sugar beet growth and increase of its productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–170

Title

Influence of bacteria of the genus Azospirillum on sugar beet productivity

O. A. Fedorova; N. V. Bezler Abstract book of the 2nd International Scientific Conference "Plants and Microbes: the Future of Biotechnology" PLAMIC2020 2020. doi:10.28983/plamic2020.072

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-c5ffd0f7f87e8fa73c9e53dde53cce030b5306efa06c2d204153b1b6cb11e161 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 39 positive, 3 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Sugar beet mild yellowing virus reduced sugar beet root yield as much as milder SBYV strains, but less than severe strains.

    SUGAR BEET YELLOWS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE DISTRIBUTION AND INTERRELATIONSHIPS OF VIRUSES AND VIRUS STRAINS FOUND IN EAST ANGLIA, 1955‐57 · 1958 · compared with milder SBYV strains

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Sugar beet harvest index decreased when redroot pigweed emerged with or 15 days after sugar beet.

    Influence of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) emergence time and density on yield and quality of two sugar beet cultivars · 2007

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Final-stage leaf removal reduced root yield.

    Effect of Leaf Removal on Quantitative and Qualitative Characteristics of Autumn Sugar Beet Cultivars in Golestan Province · 2021

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Fertilized sole sugar beet plants with 100 kg N/feddan gave the highest root yield, 29.35 and 31.47 ton/fed.

    AGRO-ECONOMIC IMPACT OF INTERCROPPING CANOLA AND ONION ON SOME SUGAR BEET VARIETIES UNDER DIFFERENT NITROGEN RATES · 2015

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Appropriate potassium nutrition reduced sugar beet drought-related yield-loss risk.

    Potassium fertilization, water shortages during vegetation and crop yielding variability the case of sugar beets · 2002

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Combined application increased yield components and sucrose percentage.

    Impact of Different Application Methods and Concentrations of Ascorbic Acid on Sugar Beet under Salinity Stress Conditions · 2020 · compared with AsA applied as a seed soaking or foliar spray

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Planting the sugar beet variety Husam at 10 and 60 cm intra- and inter-row distances gave the lowest sugar loss yield (SLY).

    Response of sugar beet varieties to plant geometrical distribution · 2022

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Intercropping with Giza 843 gave the highest sugar beet yield and attributes.

    Intercropping of some Faba Bean Cultivars with Sugar Beet using Different Irrigation Intervals under Sprinkler System in Sandy Soils · 2020

    Same direction

33 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

inoculation · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Combined inoculation did not alter F113 growth or production of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol.

    Combining proteolytic and phloroglucinol‐producing bacteria for improved biocontrol of Pythium ‐mediated damping‐off of sugar beet · 1998

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Biofertilizer alone gave the lowest root and sugar yields.

    Effect of Bio and Mineral Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet in Newly Reclaimed Lands in Egypt · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Biostimulant treatment B3 gave the significantly highest root yield compared with the control.

    Quantity and Quality Changes in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris Provar. Altissima Doel) Induced by Different Sources of Biostimulants · 2022 · compared with control type

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Mineral biofertilizer fermented for 20 to 30 days, combined with mineral fertilization at planting, improved beet growth, gas exchange and production.

    Growth, gas exchanges and production of beet CV. katrina under organo-mineral fertilization · 2017

    Same direction

  5. positive
    IAA or Kainten with 75% mineral fertilizer plus Nitrobine achieved the highest sugar beet yield.

    Sugar Beet Yield and Quality As Affected by Growth Regulators, Mineral and Bio-Fertilization in Nubaria Region · 2019

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Beet seedlings produced with bokashi plus biodynamic preparations P502-P507 yielded highly in the field.

    Quality of Bokashi-Type Biofertilizer Formulations and Its Application in the Production of Vegetables in an Ecological System · 2023

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Thiram plus P. fluorescens gave the highest root yield, 85.15 t/ha.

    Effect of bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens and low fungicide dose seed treatments on parasite fungus Aphanomyces cochlioides and sugar beet yield and quality · 2006

    Same direction

  8. positive
    The best combined treatment gave the maximum total benefit cost ratio of 4.32 in table beet.

    Effect of Natural and Bio-Fertilizers on Productivity and Quality of Table Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Grown in Sandy Soil at Siwa Oasis, Egypt · 2018 · compared with other treatments

    Same direction

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 112 positive, 8 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Spraying with copper or captan did not increase the yield of uninoculated sugar beet plants.

    The control of Alternaria species on leaves of sugar beet infected with yellowing viruses · 1965

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Boron spraying time reportedly had no considerable effect on tops dry weight, sugar loss %, sugar loss yield and some impurity concentrations.

    Effect Concentration and Spraying Time of Boron on Yield and Quality Traits of Sugar Beet Grown in Newly Reclaimed Soil Conditions · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Daminozide did not affect plant height, seed yield, germination, monogermity or size distribution.

    Harvesting sugar-beet seed · 1974

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Foliar insecticides had little or no effect on root yield.

    Foliar insecticides for the control of curly top in Idaho sugar beet, 2017 · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Delaying foliar yeast spraying from 60 to 70 and 90 days after sowing decreased root and sugar yields.

    EFFECT OF FOLIAR AND SOIL APPLICATION DATES OF YEAST (Saccharomyces Cerevisiae) ON SUGAR BEET PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY · 2015

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Foliar dressing with microelements had practically no effect on sugar beet seed yield.

    INFLUENCE OF BASIC MINERAL FERTILIZER AND FOLIAR FEEDING WITH MICROELEMENTS ON SUGAR BEET SEEDS YIELD, STRUCTURE AND QUALITY · 2021

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    FarmDroid with spot spraying would cost slightly more than conventional surface spraying.

    Climate impact, toxicological risks and economic efficiency of conventional and new weed control methods in sugar beet · 2024 · compared with conventional surface spraying

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Broadcast solid and sprayed liquid fertilizer gave equal sugar yields.

    Comparisons of liquid and solid fertilizers and anhydrous ammonia for sugar beet · 1970 · compared with broadcast solid

    No difference from an alternative

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.