Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The weed-free check yielded 5.61 t/ha.

A claim from Efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides application alone and in combination in wheat · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weed-free check yielded 5.61 t/ha.

Treatment
weed free checke0
Outcome
wheat yielde1
Value
5.61 t/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed free check (5.61 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1438
t0

“Efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides application alone and in combination in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93
e1

“The higher wheat yield of 5.51 t/ha recorded with the application of sulfosulfuron + metribuzin 25 + 105 g/ha which was at par with sulfosulfuron + carfentrazone 25 + 40 g/ha (5.46 t/ha), clodinafop + metribuzin 60 + 105 g/ha (5.23 t/ha), clodinafop + metribuzin at 60 and 122.5 g/ha (5.17 t/ha) and weed free check (5.61 t/ha), and significantly superior to rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1492

Title

Efficacy of different post-emergence herbicides application alone and in combination in wheat

Mohit Kumar; Roop Kishore; Sanjay Kumar; et al. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-c65e5d0b43da48c291677a7c32ea03f3399e118479bbb8d114c10e4c31802a39 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this claim · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

554 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.